Talk:Rachel Plummer

A fact from Rachel Plummer appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 September 2007. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Rachel Plummer wrote the first book about being a slave to the Comanche Native Americans?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2007/September.

Wikipedia

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

United States: Texas Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Texas portal This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as Low-importance).

Indigenous peoples of North America

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Not much, but a start. I'll work on it as time permits, or of course, feel free to help. (Texan Traveler 04:26, 12 June 2006 (UTC))[reply]

Wrong Fort Parker

The link to Fort Parker points to an entirely different Fort Parker, an Army fort in Montana. --Davecampbell 19:45, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Restoring conclusion

I restored the conclusion which had been edited out of the article. The fact a pregnant 17 year old girl was able to survive for 2 years among the fierce Comanches remains an amazing feat. Her book is a timeless look inside a culture long destroyed, and the end section is a vital part of the article. John1951 23:37, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to remove the section again. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, [a memorial], and we should be trying to present the text in a formal format. The articles should also be written in neutral point of view, and this conclusionary paragraph is meant to have a point-of-view. The facts should instead be presented in a concise format without editorializing. Encyclopedia articles should also not have a conclusion. Is there any information missing in the rest of the article that is in the conclusion that you feel should be included? Karanacs 01:23, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Karanacs - I disagree with you on this, but will defer to your more experienced judgment. I felt that the article benefited from the final section, which emphasized the truly amazing feat of survival by a pregnant 17 year old girl. That is not POV, since the sources cited agreed. I don't think it is editorializing when it quotes respected historians. But again, I am not trying to have an edit war with you. I would rather work with you on improving this article, and others. John1951 12:34, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]