Talk:RFA Proteus

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the RFA Proteus article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / British / European

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force

Started article

The story of the Proteus' procurement is starting to gain traction and as such I think it's worth starting the page. I have created the stub, populated some information in the infobox, and provided some references for that information. However the article needs to be expanded quite a lot. I aim to add more in the coming days, but would be grateful for any updates from other users too. Go wild :) Xtrememachineuk (talk) 21:43, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Article title - including Pennant Number

I have reverted this page back to that which includes the pennant number (K60) in the title. All other articles relating to RFA ships do this, even for ships with no previous uses of the name. There are also templates that require the specific pennant number to be included to link to the correct article. I'm happy to discuss, but to keep the page aligned with all other RFA ships I've reverted it back and undone the move. Xtrememachineuk (talk) 15:46, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just by way of example, RFA Tiderace (A137) also has the pennant number, and there has been no previous RFA Tiderace in service. Xtrememachineuk (talk) 15:46, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:NC-SHIPS or WP:DISAMBIGUATION. A ship that is the only ship of that name, in this case, the only ship in RFA service to be named Proteus, does not need its pennant number as a dismabiguator. Pennant numbers are interchangeable and mean nothing other than as an identifier. You could have put the ship's call sign as the disambiguator for all the information it provides. You should not have moved the page back before opening the discussion. This has been discussed elsewhere at length and it was on you to find those discussions. I will now move the page back to its correct location. Please see Talk:USNS Earl Warren#Requested move 26 March 2023 to see how these discussion usually go. WP:OTHERTHINGSEXIST is not a good argument in any discussion. Llammakey (talk) 16:58, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also thank you for bringing that article to my attention. I will get that fixed in a jiffy. Llammakey (talk) 17:07, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently there are two ships named RFA Tiderace, hence the need for disambiguation. Llammakey (talk) 17:09, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]