Talk:Pyrrhus and Cineas

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy Low‑importance

	Philosophy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability and sources

While I'm not entirely alien to the idea of simply merging the article on the book with the article on Beauvoir, the actual philosophical content of the book justifies a larger article. However, as I do not have an English translation of the work, I will probably not be able to give a complete account of the book in terms of the translated concrete contents (the philosophical content, however...). I created the article because the essay contains some of the most basic elements of Beauvoir's philosophy, and as such it should be on Wikipedia. When it comes to secondary sources, I mainly read primary literature, so I can only refer to the contents of the work. I know that's probably not the best way to go about things, but I hoped someone else would be able to supply such things; perhaps starting the article would be enough to get people to start supplying stuff. Der Zeitgeist (talk) 13:17, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]