Talk:Pudsey

UK geography Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Mid‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Mid‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Pudsey is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities

Leeds

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Leeds, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Leeds on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LeedsWikipedia:WikiProject LeedsTemplate:WikiProject LeedsLeeds

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Pudsey bus station was copied or moved into Pudsey with this edit on 15:53, 1 February 2021. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Untitled

This is regarding an edit that added "As well as the architect of the Whitehouse who also resided in pudsey." Unless you're referring to a different White House, as the article James Hoban says, this is not the case. Junkyardprince 21:08, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Benjamin Latrobe

It seems that Benjamin Latrobe only designed the porticos of the White House, he didnt actually live in Pudsey but in the nearby village, Fulneck Moravian Settlement. -King of the North East 15:21, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fulneck/Pudsey

Fulneck is technically part of Pudsey and even Leeds. For more info on James Hoban see Fulneck. --Jonwood1 13:59, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Postcode

The main Pudsey postcode is LS28, but adding this to the infobox results in it being displayed as [[LS28]]. Something isn't quite set up correctly or I'm doing something wrong. Can someone fix it?--Mendors 21:00, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's ok as it is, it forms a link to the LS postcode area article. 22 February 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.149.72.56 (talk) 09:38, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Pudsey Station

The statement that New Pudsey station which opened in 1967 was meant to replace the two stations on the Pudsey loop that had been closed in 1964 is not really accurate at all. If anything it ostensibly replaced Stanningley station which was on the same line and closed shortly after New Pudsey had opened. New Pudsey was an early prototype of a 'Parkway' (ie Park and ride) station of which numerous have been built or converted from existing stations since. It was named New Pudsey for political reasons and the name has always been misleading and inappropriate. (86.142.102.106 (talk) 23:34, 8 June 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Re' article's statement about Farsley, Calverley, Rodley and Swinnow

The article seems to imply that they are part of the town of Pudsey. Yet the Farsley article says it is a separate town, Calverley and Rodley articles say they are separate villages while Swinnow article says that it is in West Leeds between Bramley and Pudsey. Clearly some clarification is needed. Of course from the parliamentary point of view all five are parts of the "Pudsey" UK Parliamentary constituency, along with Guiseley and Horsforth, etc. 4 June 2012 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.22.170.213 (talk) 22:14, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Altitude of Pudsey compared to Leeds and Bradford

The History section says Pudsey position is in a slight valley between Leeds and Bradford. This is not correct. Google gps gives Pudsey leisure centre as 173 metres, Leeds Bridge as 33 metres and Bradford Centenary Square as 100 metres. 3 February 2018 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.79.80.17 (talk) 12:20, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Pudsey/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

.

Requires additional photographs
Requires addition of further inline references using one of the {{Cite}} templates
Switch existing references to use one of the {{Cite}} templates
Copy edit for WP:MOS

Keith D (talk) 11:38, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 11:38, 30 January 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 03:32, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Pudsey. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:12, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]