Talk:Psylla pyri
Appearance
Requested move 16 January 2025
[edit]
It has been proposed in this section that Psylla pyri be renamed and moved to Cacopsylla pyri. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Psylla pyri → Cacopsylla pyri – Please place your rationale for the proposed move here. Roy Bateman (talk) 02:09, 16 January 2025 (UTC) This is a significant pest sp. and databases agree this should be in Cacopsylla: also see GBIF and comment below, Roy Bateman (talk) 02:09, 16 January 2025 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
According to EPPO[1] and CABI[2] this should be Cacopsylla pyri
Maccheek (talk) 11:18, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
- ^ http://eppt.eppo.org
- ^ www.cabicompendium.org