Talk:Proper acceleration

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the relativity task force.

I modified this page to highlight a number of uses that proper acceleration has, beyond the role already mentioned for it in providing the frame-invariant magnitude of an object's four-acceleration. The only application section provided so far, however, involves constant (1+1)D acceleration. More application sections should materialize in the days ahead. Thermochap (talk) 00:55, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Items to discuss

geometric acceleration is not defined/linked to  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drasica (talk • contribs) 03:00, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Footnotes

Unfounded revert.

@User:46.208.131.118 Please, could you explain the reason for your revert? Unlike your revert, my edits were not "harmful", just the opposite. By the way, are you a sockpuppet of User:Kzqj?

@User:Kzqj Why did you revert my edit without any explanation? In the current context "corollary" does not mean anything different from "consequence" or "result". The term corollary is better suited to math and logic, not physics. Read the following sentences:

"As a consequence, gravity has a negligible influence on..."
"As a corollary, gravity has a negligible influence on..."
"A corollary is that gravity has a negligible influence on..."

Which version would you choose?

If you see any mistakes in my edit, then please, point them out, and I will be happy. If you do it, chances are that you will feel happier too. 85.193.215.210 (talk) 22:38, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]