Talk:Process and Reality

Philosophy: Literature / Metaphysics / Contemporary Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophical literature
	Metaphysics
	Contemporary philosophy

Books

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:

[[Four causes#Description|efficient causality]] The anchor (#Description) has been deleted by other users before.

The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links.

Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error

Subjectivist?

Is Whitehead really a subjectivist? I've never heard him described in this way. I thought the philosophy of organism had more like a neutral monism than a subjectivism or idealism. --The Hanged Man 01:21, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Whitehead is not a subjectivist. As you say, if one tried to describe his scheme in otherwise established terms, one would be inclined to speak of neutral monism. That is essential to Whitehead's scheme.Chjoaygame (talk) 07:55, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Process Philosophy

Someone who knows more about Whitehead than I do (I know nothing) might want to rescue an overzealous explanation of this book from the Process Philosophy page, which also needs attention. --98.100.207.38 (talk) 09:44, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if the Process philosophy article's account, largely written by me, of Process and Reality is "overzealous". Please explain what that means, or suggest or enact remedies. What do you mean "rescue"?Chjoaygame (talk) 07:55, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]