Talk:Port Jervis Line

	Trains Portal
DYK	December 30, 2018

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject New York City Public Transportation (assessed as High-importance).

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Port Jervis Line map.

Merge

This article seems a lot like the Main Line (NJ Transit) article. As such, I am proposing this for a merger. --AEMoreira042281 16:20, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. The Main Line article should cover just those stations up to Suffern that are owned and operated by NJ Transit. The Port Jervis Line is Metro-North's baby. Daniel Case 02:59, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Final date of passenger service west of Port Jervis

The final date of passenger service west of Port Jervis was on 11/27/66, according to "The Decline and Fall of E-L Passenger Service" http://rails.jimgworld.com/psngrs.html. This site has a thorough timeline account of the final days of passenger service on the E-L lines.Dogru144 (talk) 04:44, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article stuck in infobox

Anyone know why all the text in the article seems to be stuck in the infobox for the article?Ktburbank (talk) 11:18, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted an edit to Template:Infobox route diagram which broke the article. – Train2104 (t • c) 13:05, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Siemens Charger note

I'm heavily involved in railroad advocacy, the friend of an MTA board member and I have heard nothing of the sort. While Metro-North is looking for new locomotives that is only for the East-of-Hudson operations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Northeastern292 (talk • contribs) 00:58, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Orange Line (MNRR Port Jervis Line)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Orange Line (MNRR Port Jervis Line) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 6#Orange Line (MNRR Port Jervis Line) until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. TartarTorte 00:04, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wording choice

What does everyone think about the usage of the term "funds" rather than "subsidizes". My feeling is that the word subsidy tends to have a negative connotation and therefore funding would be a more neutral tone, and hence better. What does everyone else think? Znns (talk) 03:57, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]