Talk:Popular Front Incident

Japan Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 08:14, December 20, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Japan to do list:

Peer review: None
A-class review: None

Featured content candidates –

Articles: None
Pictures: None
Lists: None

Good article nominations: Vinland Saga (TV series), Godzilla Minus One
Add requested images to articles that need them.
Pages for Deletion: Participate in Japan-related deletion discussions.
Improve and expand Japan-related stubs.
Create some requested articles.
Help translate an article from the Japanese Wikipedia into English.
Assess unassessed articles

Socialism

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Other names for Popular Front Incident

from the book The Culture of Japanese Fascism edited by Alan Tansman page 72 to 73, The Popular Front Incident may have went by the name "People's Front Incident" which in japanese is Jinmin Sensen jiken

page 182 of The State and the Mass Media in Japan, 1918-1945 By Gregory J. Kasza translates the Popular Front Incident as jinmin Sensen jiken — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greg723 (talk • contribs) 01:53, 3 September 2014‎ (UTC)[reply]

The article wording currently implies that this "incident" extended from December 1937 to February 1938, a period of three months. Was it one single incident, or a series of incidents? This needs to be clarified. --DAJF (talk) 00:09, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]