Jump to content

Talk:Police misconduct

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 August 2019 and 9 December 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Brendanepton. Peer reviewers: Lsheban, EmeraldJ.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:29, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 January 2020 and 25 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Rhenr069.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:29, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 11 January 2021 and 13 March 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Vak5757.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 02:29, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Gdk2000.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 06:50, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Tisane (talk) 19:58, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted snitch tickets

[edit]

I deleted the paragraph on "snitch tickets". Tricking people into providing information about a crime is normal and is not misconduct. [1][2] - RoyBoy 21:46, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Barring high IQs for cops

[edit]

I first ran across Court OKs Barring High IQs for Cops the other day, where in 2000the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New York upheld the lower court ruling against Robert Jordan's discrimination lawsuit. I tried to find the case but couldn't find it. I'm not sure this can be worked into any articles but perhaps some other article might speak on it at some point and provide some context on how prevalent this might be. II | (t - c) 05:18, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Contradiction?

[edit]

The current article contains excerpt following, which seems to claim both that ACLU challenges (to eavesdropping laws) have so far failed in federal court, and also that the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals (a federal court) rules in favor of the ACLU. I believe the text in bold should be removed from the current article, as it is factually incorrect per citation [20] on the current article. In a recent edit, I have removed this sentence and the associated reference.

In response U.S. law enforcement have begun using eavesdropping and wiretapping laws to charge citizens who record police without their knowledge. Some police organizations such as the Fraternal Order of Police support the prosecutions,[17] and are relieved ACLU attempts to challenge the Illinois eavesdropping act have so far failed in the federal courts.[18] In Illinois, recording police without consent is a class 1 felony that can carry a prison term of 15 years.[19] In a May 2012 ruling, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 that the statute "likely violates the First Amendment’s free- speech and free-press guarantees."[20]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Police misconduct. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:55, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Body Cameras

[edit]

In 2015 alone there were 1145 deaths caused by police officers. 986 of those deaths were caused by firearms. And of those, 90 of the ones killed were unarmed. Controversial deaths of black and mentally ill civilians and sexual misconduct (1000 licenses revoked in just 6 years) of police officers is a main topic of discussion. Body Cameras can help solve a lot of these issues. Making it mandatory for police officers to wear body cameras, and have them ON and operating during their ENTIRE shifts will help promote the transparency of the police force as well as improving their somewhat tarnished reputation. Yes, there may be some concerns regarding privacy, but with proper policies and procedures being set up and followed, privacy can be kept. Police officers will also find a sense of security knowing that civilians cannot try to take advantage of them and that their proper actions are not being turned around and charged against them. In the end, people will be able to sleep better at night knowing that the police are out there to do what they took an oath to do, Serve and Protect, rather than abusing the power behind the badge.[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chill0529 (talk • contribs) 21:11, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/investigative/2015/12/26/a-year-of-reckoning-police-fatally-shoot-nearly-1000

Seizure dirt bike

[edit]

So on the 23/2/2017 I was riding my dirt bike on a field then i was approached by 2 officers. After checks were done on the bike they said it was ok for me to be there so I went back the following day then my bike was seized. I tried to explain my self yet the cop was having none of it. What can I do on this situation 77.103.21.84 (talk) 17:20, 24 February 2017 (UTC)Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).[reply]

Bibliography

[edit]

http://projects.chicagoreporter.com/settlements/case/16-cv-9149/Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).

https://www.nytimes.com/1995/04/22/opinion/the-cost-of-police-brutality.htmlCite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).

https://psmag.com/news/the-cost-of-police-misconductCite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).

https://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1806&=&context=pubs&=&sei-redir=1&referer=https%253A%252F%252Fwww.bing.com%252Fsearch%253Fq%253Dcost%252Bof%252Bpolice%252Bbrutality%2526form%253DEDGEAR%2526qs%253DAS%2526cvid%253D73e85d0df9604585a986884d58b64ae1%2526cc%253DUS%2526setlang%253Den-US%2526plvar%253D0#search=%22cost%20police%20brutality%22Cite error: There are <ref> tags on this page without content in them (see the help page).

Wiki Education assignment: Introduction to Policy Analysis

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 28 March 2022 and 30 May 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Katielizsp24.

Wiki Education assignment: Senior Seminar

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 9 January 2023 and 28 April 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lucashodges (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Popo10-4.

— Assignment last updated by Acsieling (talk) 18:27, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Potential copyvio

[edit]

Potential copyright violation at section "Advantages and Disadvantages of Body Worn Cameras - Police Misconduct". 89.67.244.199 (talk) 14:20, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Talk:Police_misconduct&oldid=1224631380"