Talk:Pictorial Review
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Why this article exists
[edit]This is for the deletionists out there: This article exists because it had over 20 legitimate inbound red-links and had a circulation of millions. That makes it notable. davidwr (talk) 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Date of first issue?
[edit]The article text gives a date of September 1899 for the magazine's first issue, while the sidebar says it was September 1889. Which is correct? 24.239.54.219 (talk) 20:40, 20 January 2013 (UTC)
Needs expansion
[edit]This article needs:
- Publication information for its entire history.
- List of major contributors and contributions. Some are listed on the What Links Here page.
- Historical significance of the magazine. What makes it notable besides its wide circulation and the fact that it has over 20 inbound links?
- An example cover or two. The earlier the better to avoid copyright issues.
- Changes in the magazine's content over the years