Talk:Piano Quintet No. 2 (Dvořák)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

Long footnote

seemed much better than adding a trivia section, since the footnote isn't unmoored; it's specifically about the second movement, and avoids one failing which has caused the trivia sections to be deprecated with reason. (And lengthy footnotes are a tradition :) ) Hope it's ok, seriously- itself it does need some improvement. If both pieces were IMSLP-accessible it would be easy to say eg reasoning-by-observation. As is, the score of op 83 there is presently [B]-blocked... Schissel | Sound the Note! 17:17, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Four masterpieces"?

I changed this to just "masterpieces" for NPOV. Even though the opinion is sourced it is still just an opinion, and I suspect an eccentric one. Raff but not Schubert, Franck or Shostakovitch? Definitely enters the realms of the debatable/POV. I hope my change solves the neutrality issue to everyone's satisfaction; in any case, the article is about Dvorak, not Raff. Mentioning Schumann and Brahms makes sense however, as it might point the reader to two important influences on Dvorak. Mcoverdale (talk) 21:44, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]