Talk:Philip Baxter

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 16, 2017	WikiProject A-class review	Approved

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 22, 2015.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Philip Baxter was chairman of the Australian Atomic Energy Commission and the Sydney Opera House Trust?

Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on May 7, 2022, and May 7, 2023.

Biography: Military / Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: Biography / South Pacific / British / European / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	World War II task force

Additional information:
/
	This article has passed an A-Class review.

Australia: Military history Mid‑importance

	Australia portal Philip Baxter is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Chemistry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Engineering Low‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

"His advice was appreciated, his recommendations accepted..."

The source given for this sentence is a newspaper article which only quotes the primary. Rephrase or better source is needed. Better sources are needed elsewhere also. Juan Riley (talk) 01:48, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tube Alloy edits

User:Hawkeye7, here we go again. My first objection to the sourcing of this sentence was put here yesterday on the talk page. That reference, as I said, for a quite judgmental sentence was actually derived from quotes by the subject in a newspaper article. You ignored my posting so after a day without a "helpful" response I deleted the sentence. Now you have obviously abandoned that reference and cite another as the source. But there is no reference given for this sentence. Given its subjective status there really has to be. If Gowing says this then it is his/her opinion now..and should be just quoted. Juan Riley (talk) 21:23, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hawkeye7, do not use edits marked as "minor" to revert content edits. Juan Riley (talk) 21:25, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is a reference at the end of the sentence, and it is to Gowing, pp. 258-259. Baxter's return to Oak Ridge as assistant to the General Manager is not an opinion, it is a fact, and Gowing supplies this fact. An article is sourced from its references. It is not a collection of quotations. Why didn't you check Gowing yourself? If you are an expert on the subject, why don't you know who Gowing is? Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:36, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hawkeye7, of course he came back. The issue was consensus objective references to "His advice was appreciated, his recommendations accepted...". This you ignored. Perhaps like on past edits you see the problem without admitting it--and slither away. Find a good source that says it and Bob's your uncle. And now you go all "I am an expert" on me? I kinda like thinking that no I am not an expert...and see the agenda in your edits. There are quite a few signs in just this article of white washing. Juan Riley (talk) 21:45, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hawkeye7, not that I doubt the possible request from Groves, but that sentence is not referenced. Juan Riley (talk) 22:15, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is. By footnotes 3 and 8 at the end of the next sentence. Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:16, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Hawkeye7, you mean at the end of the next sentence? Juan Riley (talk) 23:20, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Geez I thought you were an expert? The refs at the end of the next sentence? Juan Riley (talk) 23:22, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Where would these quotes fit in?

"Australia was in Baxter's words,'the last big continent which the white has to develop and populate'(Baxter 1957, p. 75), and nuclear power was to be his instrument." From MacLeod, Roy (1995). "Resistance to Nuclear Technology: optimists, opportunists and opposition in Australian nuclear history". Page 169, in Bauer, Martin W. Resistance to new technology : nuclear power, information technology, and biotechnology. Cambridge ; New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780521455183. OCLC 30777787. A reference, not a quote, apparently removed by User:Hawkeye7. Juan Riley (talk) 22:28, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's a book I have here. I added it to the references, but then didn't use it, so I removed it. I can put the quote in if you like it. Hawkeye7 (talk) 23:19, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

'Twould provide a more balanced view of this person who comes off in much that I have read the last day as a bit of a bureaucratic racist factotum. Juan Riley (talk) 23:26, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hawkeye7: Not that you like balance. Only if I like? Quite a "historian" you pretend to be. Juan Riley (talk) 01:57, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hawkeye7:Still nothing on this subject? Well then go right ahead and keep call yourself an historian. Juan Riley (talk) 00:09, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]