Talk:Pertinax

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pertinax article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Pertinax has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 20, 2018	Good article nominee	Listed

Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on March 28, 2005, March 28, 2006, March 28, 2007, March 28, 2008, March 28, 2009, March 28, 2011, March 28, 2012, March 28, 2013, March 28, 2015, March 28, 2016, March 28, 2018, March 28, 2019, and March 28, 2023.

Biography: Military / Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility (assessed as Low-importance).

Classical Greece and Rome Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Biography / British / European / Roman & Byzantine / Classical

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Roman and Byzantine military history task force
	Classical warfare task force (c. 700 BC – c. 500 AD)

Roman and Byzantine emperors Top‑importance

	This article is within the scope of the Roman and Byzantine Emperors WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the Roman and Byzantine emperors. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Roman and Byzantine emperorsWikipedia:WikiProject Roman and Byzantine emperorsTemplate:WikiProject Roman and Byzantine emperorsRoman and Byzantine emperors
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.

Soldiers on Palatine Hill

Pertinax was not murdered by a mere uprising of soldiers on the Palatine hill, he was murdered by the Praetorians was he not? From all the historical accounts I have been able to observe, including modern accounts such as those from Gibbons, Pertinax was not simply executed by a mob of soldiers, but targeted from within the Praetorian ranks. Should his box not be changed to reflect the fact that he was murdered by the Praetorian Guard?

Change in Wording

I have slightly changed the wording of the events of March 193, and added some detail. Anthony.bradbury 12:10, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fictional version of Pertinax

Should there be some mention made of the role played by Pertinax in an alternate history novel, Romanitas? In this, he survives assasination, and goes on to carry out many important reforms. WikiReaderer 21:48, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duration of Reign

The article first states "[h]e was emperor for only 87 days" and later states "[h]is short reign (86 days) was an uneasy one". Gibbon has it as "86 days only after the death of Commodus", which would seem to possibly be 24 hour units rather than calendar days, as Commodus seems to have been killed near midnight and Pertinax was killed near noon. But the article should pick one.

216.77.227.14 21:51, 12 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image

Is that a Gorgoneion depicted on Pertinax' breastplate? --Steerpike (talk) 16:35, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ethnic origin

Hello i wonder to ask about his ethnic origin, we know he was from Italy, but son of one freedman, so was his father of italian origin too? Or any slave from any other part of empire? Do we know it? Thanks--188.167.120.126 (talk) 19:23, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Due to his position in the Senate at this time in the Roman Empire, any origins as a slave/freedman for his ancestry are highly doubtful. HammerFilmFan (talk) 10:25, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Both Herodian and Dio Cassius (contemporary with Pertinax) state that he was the son of a freedman. This might not be a bar to advancement for a man with abilities, especially as his freedman father had made an advantageous marriage. Also, his father's owner would have taken an interest in the boy as was the custom at the time. Indeed Prtinax seems to have had a decent education and originally started out as a teacher before settling on the army. At each stage he would have had patrons helping him. 2A00:23C7:6B89:9101:ADCC:9738:93DC:CF52 (talk) 01:39, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Currency

The article says "He devalued the Roman currency dramatically, increasing the silver purity of the denarius from 74% to 87% — the actual silver weight increasing from 2.22 grams to 2.75 grams." But isn't this wrong? If he increased the purity of the silver coin, isn't that the exact opposite of devaluing? Leecharleswalker (talk) 21:55, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, my mistake. cagliost (talk) 16:51, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dynasty

Pertinax was emperor during the Severan Dynasty 50.78.14.145 (talk) 18:00, 19 January 2018 (UTC) Anonymous[reply]

No, he was not. 50.111.22.12 (talk) 00:48, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Clarification needed

In section "Emperor": "Ancient writers detail how the Praetorian Guard expected a generous donativum on his ascension, and when they were disappointed, agitated until he produced the money, selling off Commodus' property,[20] including the concubines and youths Commodus kept for his sexual pleasures": who sold off Commodus' property, the Praetorians or the emperor himself to produce the money? ditto for the youths. "The purple" - What is "the purple"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pintogrunt (talk • contribs) 06:35, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"The purple" meant the office of Princeps, or later the 'emperor' - purple was the color reserved for the throne - the Roman tunic would reflect a large purple sash, cape, etc., depending on the garb. 50.111.22.12 (talk) 00:50, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Pertinax/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Iazyges (talk · contribs) 06:02, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Will start soon. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 06:02, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria

GA Criteria

GA Criteria:

1
1.a Y

1.b Y
2
2.a Y

2.b Y

2.c Y

2.d Y
3
3.a Y

3.b Y
4
4.a Y
5
5.a Y
6
6.a Y

6.b Y

No DAB links Y
No dead links Y
No missing citations N Missing citations for:
1. This currency reform did not survive his death.
2. thus protecting them from the aftermath of his own assassination. He did however appoint his father-in-law Titus Flavius Claudius Sulpicianus as Praefectus urbi of Rome.
3. This is in marked contrast to Dio's opinion of both Pertinax's predecessor Commodus and successor Julianus.
4. Machiavelli considered Pertinax's attempt to reform a soldiery that had become "accustomed to live licentiously" a mistake, as it inspired their hatred of him, which led to his overthrow and death

@Векочел: The issue of missing citations will need to be addressed, but article is otherwise in good shape. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 06:46, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Векочел: re-pinging. -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 14:57, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- @Iazyges: I have added a citation from Machiavelli's The Prince. Векочел (talk) 17:08, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Prose Suggestions

Please note that all of these are suggestions, and can be implemented or ignored at your discretion.

He fought in the war with the Parthians during the 160s, and success there led to higher-ranking positions in both the military and political spheres, including provincial governor and urban prefect. Suggest:
He fought in the Roman–Parthian War of 161–166, where his success led him to be promoted to higher-ranking positions in both the military and political spheres, leading to him achieving the rank of provincial governor and urban prefect.
He was also a member of the Roman Senate, where he was a contemporary of the historian Cassius Dio. Suggest:
He was a member of the Roman Senate, serving at the same time as the historian Cassius Dio.
His historical reputation has largely been a positive one, following the assessment of Dio.
His historical reputation has largely been a positive one, in line with the assessment of Dio.
He tried to quell the unruly soldiers there but one legion attacked his bodyguard. I believe this should be legionary, unless the entire legion did in fact attack him.
@Векочел: That is all my suggestions, passing now. -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 04:10, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of unreliable source

@Векочел: Pinging to inform you I have removed citations using Canduci, because it is an unreliable source. I've marked removals with a CN template, so adding new citations/culling content should be easy. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 19:33, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Omissions

I'm surprised that there is no mention of his wife, Flavia Titiana the daughter of Titus Flavius Claudius Sulpicianus. (See Historia Augusta, "Pertinax", 5.4; "Didius Julianus" 2.4). This alliance would have confirmed his admission into Senatorial ranks, & based on this alone is worth mentioning. ISTR Flavia & Pertinax had a daughter, but I cannot find any source to confirm that. -- llywrch (talk) 18:38, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Historia Augusta is notoriously unreliable, I'd be wary of accepting any statement made by it as fact. Hemiauchenia (talk) 22:01, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Under aftermath

It says "he was assassinated..." and the bio doesn't say that he was. He = pertina x. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.135.96.134 (talk) 19:20, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Historia Augusta ...

Far too much citing of this extremely skeptical work. Even when it coincides with Dio, it's not to be trusted. HammerFilmFan (talk) 10:27, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]