Talk:Percy Williams Bridgman

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as High-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

‹See TfM›

Physics: Biographies High‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Biographies Taskforce.

Philosophy: Philosophers / Science / Contemporary Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophers
	Philosophy of science
	Contemporary philosophy

History of Science Mid‑importance

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ice and the Bridgman nomenclature

The "Bridgman nomenclature" in mentioned in the articles about the crystalline forms of ice, eg. Ice_Ic, and they link to this biography but there is no mention of either ice or the nomenclature in the article. ?:-/ Ferdinangus (talk) 08:53, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pressure

Shouldn't pressure be measured Newtons per square metre, rather than kilograms per square metre? Cjb 13:00, 7 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I was just about to say the same thing! --Peter Lund <firefly@vax64.dk> 82.143.195.103 16:20, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Death of Bridgman

The text says Bridgman took his own life "after being diagnosed," which is technically correct but it implies the timing was right after he was diagnosed. Bridgman had been suffering for some time and in a note left explained that this was the last day he would physically be able to take his own life owing to the progress of his disease. (See Robert M. Hazen, The Diamond Makers) To many, the circumstances under which Bridgman took his own life, together with Bridgman's Nobel status, has been of singular relevance to how society views end-stage terminal illness and the choice made by the individual sufferer. I wonder if the article might not explain this. --PotomacFever 15:00, 28 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Does not do justice to Bridgman the philosopher

Usually, first rate practitioners of science and reflecters upon science are disjoint sets. Bridgman was a rare exception, but this entry does not do justice to that fact. Bridgman was a rare scientist whose writings are of major importance to the philosophy of science and to the study of how scientific ideas should be structured. I grant that much of Bridgman's thinking may not be in fashion at present.202.36.179.65 19:59, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree about Percy Bridgman as a cosmological theorist and on the epistemology of physics and the sciences. MaynardClark (talk) 03:30, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Date discrepancy

Under 'Major Works' there is a work published in 1980 listed. Given Bridgman died some 2 decades previously, exactly what this work is should be specified.

“Bridgman's words have been quoted by many on both sides of the assisted suicide debate.[3][4]”

The statement is unsupported by its citations. While the two citations come from sources that typically back opposing views on this issue, when you read the citations themselves, both sources use this quote to (editorially) show the (presumed) injustice of outlawing assisted suicide. I would be interested to see if someone can find a source that uses this quote to advance the anti-assisted-suicide position of the argument.
— cyberbisson (talk) 17:02, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Percy Williams Bridgman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:19, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Force

Force is the ratio of the square of viscosity to density. This understanding could have been Bridgman's as he wrote about both relativity and dimensional analysis. But he did not take to heart the fusion of L and T in Minkowski's spacetime: "Henceforth, space by itself, and time by itself, are doomed to fade away into mere shadows, and only a kind of union of the two will preserve an independent reality", spoke Minkowski in 1908.

Rather than use the L, M, T of Bridgman’s book, here force F = kg m / s², kilogram meters per second squared. And density is ρ = kg/ m³, kilograms per meter cubed. Then

F\times \rho ={\frac {kg\ m}{s^{2}}}\times {\frac {kg}{m^{3}}}=({\frac {kg}{m\cdot s}})^{2}=\mu ^{2},

where μ = kg / (m • s) , kilograms per meter-second, is dynamic viscosity measured in Poise. One can say that the viscosity is the geometric mean of force and density. Thus

F={\frac {\mu ^{2}}{\rho }},

a sophisticated consequence of relativistic thought with dimensional analysis.

As a geometric transformation, the Lorentz motion of a spacetime plane is a hyperbolic rotation which preserves hyperbolic angle, the geometric configuration used to have rapidity in kinematic description. The meter-second in the denominator of dynamic viscosity is area in a spacetime plane. The Lorentz motions, as any squeeze mapping, preserve this area. Rgdboer (talk) 01:10, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Since area is preserved, dynamic viscosity is constant under Lorentz motion, whereas force and density are subject to relativistic effect. — Rgdboer (talk) 00:49, 18 November 2023 (UTC) When μ is constant, then (F, ρ) is confined to a hyperbola. — Rgdboer (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2023 (UTC) c/e — Rgdboer (talk) 01:48, 26 November 2023 (UTC) c/e — Rgdboer (talk) 01:54, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Osborne Reynolds used kinematic viscosity to define the Reynolds number, the threshold of turbulence in fluid flow. The notion is developed in the study of aerodynamics and hydrology, referring to fluid flow rather than relativity. — Rgdboer (talk) 01:17, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]