Talk:Pedo-

Removed redirect

You got rid of my shortcut to pedophilia. :( Skinnyweed 23:33, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 24 April 2016

This edit request to Pedo has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

add new item to section "==Relating to feet=="

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. --Cameron11598 (Converse) 06:59, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relating to feet

Pedestrian, A pedestrian is a person traveling on foot, whether walking or running

80.112.146.11 (talk) 02:31, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Disambiguation#Advice please

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Disambiguation#Advice please. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:07, 24 March 2018 (UTC) Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 07:07, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Given the lack of feedback, I have left this page alone, but removed the disambiguation project tag from this Talk page, and added a link to Ped-. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 05:43, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Ped-

These pages are redundant. The content at this one is better developed (as a set-index article, more or less), while the other is a very incomplete disambiguation page. However, this bigger page is flawed, in that many words from the various ped- roots do not result in pedo- words but other ped- forms (peda-, pedia-, pedi-, pede-, etc.). So, the page is simply misnamed. PS: We should also make sure that all these prefix forms redirect to the same page. — AReaderOutThataway ^t/_c 09:49, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's also a WP:NOTDICT matter. We can have an encyclopedic article on a cluster of prefixes and their origin, their confusability, what common words in various language (especially English) are derived from which ped[x]-yielding root, North American vs. Commonwealth English spelling variations, etc., as a "content cluster", but it is not Wikipedia's job (it's Wiktionary's job) to have largely-redundant articles for every ped[x]- prefix. On WP, they should all redir to the same article, unless and until we can develop sufficient non-dictionarian content to warrant a WP:SPLIT. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 09:18, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Support merge. I was coming here to make nom's argument, only to find that it had already been made. I also agree with SMcCandlish.

NB Albinovanus Pedo would need a {{redirect}} hatnote on the merged article. It's horribly placed as a see-also. Narky Blert (talk) 16:30, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]