Jump to content

Talk:Pearl Tavern/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gerald Waldo Luis (talk · contribs) 15:06, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Heya! Responding to your talk message: on the contrary actually; I was looking for GANs recently and first looked at the restaurant section but found no nominations, so thanks for this one! On a brief scroll this article looks good, expect a complete review soon. Oh and this is probably poor advertising but, I also have a peer review still unreviewed, if you're interested you can take a look at it, but no pressure of course. GeraldWL 15:06, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Prose

[edit]

Image

[edit]

The logo image needs an alt text. The non-free rationale looks all good to me, and I don't think we need to wait for the bot to delete the previous version like I remember doing at a GAN (tip for future: if you wanna resize a copyrighted image yourself, go to this calculator). A photo of the place's location would be great, but it's fine for now.

Logo has alt text. I plan to take a photograph of the building next time I'm nearby. ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:24, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

[edit]

All sources cited are reliable, consisting of reputable websites, newspapers, mags, and radio. No original research.

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.