Talk:Paolo Veronese

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Italy Low‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Veronese is one of the great Venetian artists of the period just after Titian. Like Titian Veronese was a wonderful colorist. His most memorable work are the trompe'oil scenes he executed within glorious architectural settings in villas around the Veneto, especially in combination with Palladio's sublime architecture. Mark Faraday 05:20, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Expansion

Now I have removed the expansion tag, after adding content, cites, and images. More is needed, but the article at least looks respectable now, something closer to what Veronese merits. JNW 03:27, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes - good job! Johnbod 03:31, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- Grazie! JNW 04:00, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

real name Comin

According to a short notice in the Feb 07 Apollo, the catalogue of the big Prado exhibition (Feb-May 07) "reveals the new information that the artist's surname was Comin" Johnbod 17:23, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Levi

I've changed "heretical" to "indecorous", which I think is correct. I don't have Rearick & am going on Rostand as in the other treatment of the matter (and note - which seems to be a dead link just now;it was ok a month ago) - which I'd linked to in the caption here. We should keep our stories straight, but let me know if you want to discuss. Any whiff of heresy was remote, even by Inquisitorial standards, and this was after all Venice, not Spain. (See the original version of article also) Johnbod 09:17, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Point taken. As it turned out, the picture was not deemed heretical, but only because of the change in title, ergo content. And true enough that it being Venice, the threat to Veronese was probably not real. But was indecorousness alone enough to prompt Veronese's questioning? Even if only as a formality, I think he was facing charges of heresy. I may add a word or two to the article for clarification, but feel free to continue the discussion. JNW 13:22, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have found what appears to be a complete transcript: [1]. No details of any matter seem to have been given in the Summons & the only mention of heresy is tangential, presumably referring to German satirical prints. I had seen the meaty bit before, but hadn't realized the whole thing was so short. Rather less than the "tried for heresy" of myth. Johnbod 18:16, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- - Thank you for the link to the transcript. No, it doesn't read as particularly ominous. Yet, why else would Veronese have been summoned, if not to explore the possibility that the work contained heretical elements? And doesn't the questioning imply as much? In the article, I did not write that he was tried for heresy, because I agree that would be too heavy-handed an interpretation. If you think that 'to defend himself against charges of heresy' is too strong, do insert a better turn of phrase. I really do appreciate your input, and in the meantime I will need to dig up the Veronese books again. Thanks, JNW 20:48, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was the "indecorousness" which really is heading to sacrilege rather than heresy I suppose; evidently they thought that was within their remit. The Spanish (Seville) Inquisition had Pacheco, Velasquez's father-in-law as Censor of religious paintings. As you say, enforcing the Tridentine resolutions. Like Veronese, I suppose people were reluctant to tell them it was none of their business. Johnbod 21:34, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Changes

Time for a further revamp, with a big London exhibition coming in March. I'm inclined to remove the not very helpful infobox & use the space for a wide image of one of the biggies at a decent size. I think the "Anthology" might be hived off to a list article, maybe keeping a list of the few that have articles here. Thoughts? Johnbod (talk) 17:35, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This all sounds good to me. Ewulp (talk) 03:58, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Johnbod (talk) 14:31, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And more: "Veronese in religion" section is: "In theosophy, Paolo Veronese is believed by some, such as Charles Leadbeater, to have reincarnated as one of a more senior group of enlightened masters serving the planet Earth. In this teaching, according to some, he is called by the nickname 'Paul the Venetian', after his life as Veronese, and is said, during the 1800s at least, to have lived in Venice." WP:UNDUE, no? It could go in a footnote maybe. Johnbod (talk) 14:31, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Paolo Veronese. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090322194344/http://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/cgi-bin/WebObjects.dll/CollectionPublisher.woa/wa/work?workNumber=NG26 to http://www.nationalgallery.org.uk/cgi-bin/WebObjects.dll/CollectionPublisher.woa/wa/work?workNumber=NG26

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:16, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Who were his models?

Veronese visibly used the same models again and again, especially the female ones. Both the man and the woman in Venus and Adonis and Cephalus and Procris are the same, obviously. But "Procris" also returns as Lucretia, anybody can see that it is again the same woman. I will not go as far as saying that all the blonde women with curly hair in his 1580s paintings (such as in Mars and Venus with Cupid and a Dog) are one and the same person, but do we know more about the identity of his models?
I am well aware that had already used a blonde model with curly hair twenty years prior, for instance in Allegory of Wisdom and Strength. Could that be his wife, and the others, his daughter? --Edelseider (talk) 08:58, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]