Talk:Panthera tigris sudanensis

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

Useless article

Please delete it.

Explain WHY you think this is useless !! -- BhagyaMani (talk) 07:04, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Remember to sign your posts on talk pages. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 07:04, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Useless article part 2

This article does not really serve any purpose, and is written in a humorous way (not appropriate for an article). Therefore, I believe it should be deleted.

Proposed deletion, done properly

In part a response to the sections above, and in part simply because I noticed this article here.

This article could, and probably should, be proposed for deletion because it was a proposed subspecies based on extremely dubious evidence and with no significant coverage. This is called failing WP:GNG. Additionally, a search on Google Scholar turns up very little.

Therefore, I recommend taking this article to WP:AFD, if not simply WP:PRODed.--SilverTiger12 (talk) 00:26, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hey SilverTiger12 : this page was created already in 2008. It's not surprising that a search in internet turned up very little, because Deraniyagala and Mazak were most likely the only 2 people who ever wrote about this. This proposed subspecies is undoubtedly not valid, but this circumstance does not make the info on THIS page useless. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 07:43, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In which case, the proper place for this information and two references is on the Tiger page under the Subspecies section. Perhaps a merge would be more appropriate than a deletion?--SilverTiger12 (talk) 14:44, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As mentioned above, it's NOT a valid name. I already added it to the page about Deraniyagala, so that THIS page can be redirected to the respective section, if content will be deleted. -- BhagyaMani (talk) 15:33, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My twopenn'orth: redirect to Deraniyagala.Ingratis (talk) 17:00, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]