Talk:Paifang

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

China: History High‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Chinese history (assessed as High-importance).

East Asia (defunct)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Asia, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.East AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject East AsiaTemplate:WikiProject East AsiaEast Asia articles

Removed text

Thus the Chinese wives were sometimes forced to commit suicide after their husbands' death before long. (unsubstantiated) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Duckeggsoup (talk • contribs) 04:36, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Added image, but credible?

Hello, I added a picture (originally at http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ornamental_Gateway_(Pailou)_from_Han_Dynasty_(202_BCE_%E2%80%93_220_CE)_across_a_Street_Lined_with_Small_Shops._Hanzhong,_Shaanxi_Province,_China,_1875_WDL2092.png) that has the label "Ornamental Gateway (Pailou) from Han Dynasty (202 BCE – 220 CE)". However, I am not sure if this description is credible or not; though I am no expert, it seems to me that this gate is from a much later time than what it is marked as being from. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.166.90.105 (talk) 18:30, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]