Jump to content

Talk:PCMOS

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

algorithm or manufacturing ?

[edit]

If it uses "probabilistic algorithms" then it's a logic design, not a "semiconductor manufacturing technology".

Anyways those claims are completely irrealistic in a pragmatic business world :
"30 times less electricity while running seven times faster than the current fastest technology"
"gains that are as high as a substantial multiplicative factor of 560"

This speech reeks of vaporware media hyped to raise stock value. If it can't be made neutral, it should be removed. --Musaran (talk) 15:53, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

One or more portions of this article duplicated other source(s). The material was copied from: www.cs.rice.edu/~lc6/visen/2009cases.pdf. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. 192.54.144.229 (talk) 09:54, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Insert of March

[edit]

The work added in march is original work protected by copyright. I'm removing it, since it quite clearly doesn't fit here. 192.54.144.229 (talk) 09:51, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2012 reference with graphs

[edit]

[1] with energy v probability graphs. - Rod57 (talk) 05:01, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]