Talk:Oracle Park

Baseball Mid‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

College football Low‑importance

	College football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject College football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of college football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.College footballWikipedia:WikiProject College footballTemplate:WikiProject College footballcollege football articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Football: American & Canadian Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American and Canadian soccer task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Event Venues (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Event Venues, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Event VenuesWikipedia:WikiProject Event VenuesTemplate:WikiProject Event VenuesEvent Venues articles

Dating

Can we please have a consistent style of dating on this page? It seems as though half of the dates are 2006-03-01 which is a bizarre style of dating, at least spell out the actual month or something and about half are the regular, normal person's way of dating (August 17, 2001). So, let's decide, please!! It appears one person attempted to change it, only to have it reverted. 130.86.101.168 21:18, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The "bizarre" style of dating actually autoformats to whatever dating style you have set your preferences to. The "regular" style of dating is only used because that is the only way to include a wikilink to a specific topic within a year (like 2007 Major League Baseball season). Both of these are consistent with the Wikipedia Manual of Style.--StormXor 00:57, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Normal"-style dates, such as September 24 2007, can be used, and will work with autoformatting as well. In text, this style is probably better, as autoformatting does not work for IP users, and thus the number-style does look "bizzare". It's also better to use one style throughout the text, except those cases where "2007-09-24" must be used, such as cite templates. - BillCJ 01:29, 24 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The giant glove

Should we make note that the Giant Glove in right-center field is the largest "baseball glove" in the world. We can use Guiness as a source, it's in their latest edition.

--Kblavie 03:29, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.102.245.60 (talk) 02:12, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:AT&TParkLogo150.PNG

Image:AT&TParkLogo150.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 18:49, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bullpen

I seem to remember watching a game and one of the commentators said something to the effect the reason the relief pitchers get loose in foul territory was because they forgot to add a bullpen when designing the stadium. Not sure if this is accurate, was meant as a joke, or whatever, but thought it might be relevant if true (couldn't find anything about it in a quick google search). --86.164.126.9 (talk) 17:02, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Probably a joke. I'm fairly certain that choice was intentional, meant to evoke older ballparks like Wrigley Field, and to put fans in the bleachers closer to the action, without bullpens separating them from the outfield. DanyaRomulus (talk) 23:28, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It would be interesting to see the idea validated or invalidated on the main page. The commentators on tonight's radio broadcast of the Giants-Cardinals postseason game mentioned it again. Matthewlmcclure (talk) 01:43, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Football Capacity

What is the capacity for football games? With the temporary bleachers and the blocked seats it's hard to imagine the capacity is still 41,915. --Southronite (talk) 23:01, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No mention is made of the location of the bullpen

The bullpens were completely left out of the stadium until it was too late to add them anywhere other than the foul zones. Will (Talk - contribs) 04:08, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I came here looking for that too, and it's a commonly reported story. There is a limited amount of usable space in the location, that much is true. However, I find the story dubious, as I can't imagine an architecture firm that designs baseball stadiums for a living would "forget" to add bullpens. I suspect they were removed from an original design, possibly by the ownership and not the designers, to use the space for something else, like seats for paying customers, and the story made up by someone to account for the lack of bullpens. - BilCat (talk) 21:11, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

After some internet searching, it seems the story is probably apocryphal. See this blog, which seems to be the best source out there, which says the bullpens were designed that way on purpose to give the park an intimate feel. - BilCat (talk) 21:37, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The AT&T History Lesson

Is the history lesson of AT&T the company actually required in this article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.141.200.222 (talk) 09:14, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fence heights?

Can anyone please post the heights of the outfield fences?

Yugiohfan2010 (talk) 03:07, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on AT&T Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:59, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Baseball assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:AT&T Park/CommentsBB, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Several sources seem to contradict the statement in this article that the Giants pay nothing for use of the city land under the park.

The questionable statement:

"as well as free use of the land it sits on, among the most valuable real estate in the country" -- this appears to be based on a single 2004 source: http://news.minnesota.publicradio.org/features/2004/05/14_gordonj_sanfranpark

One contradictory article states:

"The Giants pay $1.2 million in rent each year on the 12.5-acre ballpark site, part of a 66-year lease with the San Francisco Port Commission."

(source: http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2002/oct/22/privately_built_pacific )

Another contradictory article says:

"The Giants lease the land on which the ballpark sits from the Port of San Francisco at a fair market value."

(source: http://www.ballparks.com/baseball/national/pacbel.htm )

Last edited at 11:11, 8 March 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 14:15, 10 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on AT&T Park. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:22, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]