Talk:Optical pulsar
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Merge into pulsar
[edit]Since this article is not about a natural kind of pulsars (as far as we know), but instead pulsars that happenstance have been visually identified, wouldn't it be suitable to merge it all into pulsar? ... said: Rursus (mbork³) 13:08, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
- Yep.—RJH (talk) 17:16, 5 October 2009 (UTC)
Duplicate Crab Pulsar - done
[edit]Why is there the Crab Pulsar with B=17, and PSR B0531+21 with B=18? This is the same pulsar, as you can see by following to its specific page.89.12.88.64 (talk) 17:12, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
Definition
[edit]Are these an optically visible subset of the [radio] pulsars ? or could they be optical with no radio emissions ? If so, do we separate them from variable stars just by period ? Could they be infrared optical rather than visible light ? - Rod57 (talk) 13:39, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
Is magnitude the max or min
[edit]Presumably the magnitude column is the peak magnitude. Do they all vary by 100%, ie down to zero ? Is the optical pulse profile the same as the radio pulse profile (in period and phase) ? - Rod57 (talk) 13:47, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
- Stub-Class Astronomy articles
- Low-importance Astronomy articles
- Stub-Class Astronomy articles of Low-importance
- Stub-Class Astronomical objects articles
- Pages within the scope of WikiProject Astronomical objects (WP Astronomy Banner)
- Stub-Class physics articles
- Low-importance physics articles
- Stub-Class physics articles of Low-importance