Talk:Open Sound System

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance).

Linux-centric?

This article is totaly Linux-centric. It assumes OSS is a Linux thing, but it supports 11 different Unices (including *BSD). It also says it's deprecated in favour of ALSA. This is true in the case of Linux, but not in other context.

I'm going to change the article to have a neutral, Unix-centered POV.

(I will keep, however, Linux-specific bits in a separate paragraph. I think it's worth mentioning ALSA too.)

nyu 15:35, 21 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Not linux-centric?

Actually, although OSS may not be a Linux thing, it's definitely not the standard on Unix operating systems. Most Unix operating systems *don't* use it, and Sun's Audio interface, as contributed back to CSRG, is very common and better designed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.63.52.242 (talk) 04:22, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And Wrong

It's also wrong. 'The project was initially free software, but following the project's success, Savolainen started the company 4Front Technologies and made his support for newer sound devices and improvements proprietary' is incorrect. From Savolainen's blog: 'In autumn 1995 I was contacted by Dev Mazumdar who had made a SB Pro (MCA) driver for AIX. Soon after that we decided to join forces and I become an eployee of Dev’s 4Front Technologies.' Dev Mazumdar started the company. David Chisnall (talk) 19:19, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

More than one implementation of the ALSA interface

QNX Neutrino 6.x also implements the ALSA interface, using only the user space library from the ALSA project. The ALSA kernel models are in this case replaced by a set of QNX-specific servers. QNX does not include the ALSA library directly in its Momentics IDE package because of licensing issues, though. I don't have time to update the article. The documentation available on the QNX homepage is a good source of information about this. gmueckl 12:07, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

OSS4 Re-introduced to Linux Kernel

It would be helpful to see a discussion of why OSS4 was re-introduced into the Linux kernel, and whether it now supports suspend and resume, the lack of which led to it being superseded by ALSA. I couldn't find any discussion of suspend and resume on the 4-front site. Ddssff (talk) 14:07, 14 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Features

Does it lack features compared to ALSA? Like multiple apps playing to multiple devices at the same time? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.167.58.244 (talk) 02:56, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No. In fact it surpasses ALSA in this area, as it can play more types of apps at the same time, and provide each with its own volume control 85.250.166.120 (talk) 20:51, 25 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism

What is the point of this section? Wikipedia is full of articles citing advantages & disadvantages, but this? It's rubbish. I think it should be removed. OSS is used among many other systems, maybe not the 4Front implementation, but the API is. This is becoming very Linux biased. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Agh (talk • contribs) 11:56, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Open Sound System. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.linuxpr.com/releases/9766.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 13:04, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OSS in relation to ALSA

OSS both as API and as software has been criticized by some developers, such as Paul Davis and Lennart Poettering.

As a reference for Paul Davis criticism, his article A Tutorial on Using the ALSA Audio API is being referenced. However, in that article I cannot find any mention of "OSS" or "Open Sound System". Please clarify the evidence of his criticism with a more specific reference or remove the claim that he criticised it. --DevUrandom (talk) 15:29, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. While the reference for Lennart Poettering's criticism mentions his name several times, I cannot find any direct criticism of the Open Sound System by Lennart Poettering himself on that page either. --DevUrandom (talk) 15:39, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]