Canada: Ontario Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This discussion resulted in the Templates being removed—Dec 2023

The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

About those template messages...

This article was flagged with numerous template messages in Oct 2015. There isn't anything on this talk page to explain why. Nothing specific indicated. A year and a half has elapsed. I am suggesting to remove the template messages. Feldercarb (talk) 14:37, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi from 2023 asking the same thing. If it's "not accurate" or "biased", why hasn't it been addressed in 8 years since the tagging? Remove the tags or fix the article! I want to be able to link this and know I'm using the correct information! 2607:FEA8:9A4:2200:ECB4:FAA4:6B69:9089 (talk) 23:32, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Halloween has come and gone, another 5 months gone by. I don't see any explanation or discussion of the numerous flags on this article. It's been almost two years since the original tagging. I am (again) proposing removing these flags unless some discussion appears. Feldercarb (talk) 20:14, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Grey Cup weekend, another month with no explanation...Feldercarb (talk) 22:54, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Just updated this article, in light of yesterday's verdicts. As to the four template messages (disclosure: today is the first time I've ever viewed this article, and I consider myself to be an independent Ontario voter) 1) I am impressed by the neutrality of this article, especially given the deeply partisan atmosphere surrounding this issue. 2) I am not qualified to assess encyclopedic tone. 3) I do not understand the undue weight complaint; the article is about a "scandal", and in my opinion it is overall well-focused and avoids tangential partisan issues. 4) Added "political scandals" and "trials of political people." Ceec.ssb64 (talk) 07:02, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Livingston sentenced today. Barring unforeseen developments, this is likely the end of the history of this scandal. It would be good to see resolution of these tags. No change to my opinions as above. Ceec.ssb64 (talk) 16:36, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus seems to be to remove the flags? (3 to 0 for removal? waited 11 months)Feldercarb (talk) 16:45, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Templates removed per discussion. 99.238.38.246 (talk) 05:00, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]