Talk:One person, one vote

This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page:
• One man, one vote
Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:
• Talk:One man, one vote

Elections and Referendums

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums

Human rights

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights

Separation from One man, one vote

As per discussion on Talk:One man, one vote on Requested move 22 May 2022, there is a significant difference between One man, one vote and One person, one vote. For example, plenty legal documents refer to one person, one vote. That means I think it should not be just redirected from One person, one vote to One man, one vote, but One person, one vote deserves a separate article. HudecEmil (talk) 02:43, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]