Talk:Non-orientable wormhole

I can't find a source for the term "Alice Handle" anywhere.

This appears at the end of the introduction on this page as an alternative name for the non-orientable wormhole. Unless someone can find a source for it, I think it should be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saejin's-toenails (talk • contribs) 05:24, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merging Alice universe

Alice universe is not notable enough to have its own page. It would make a lot of sense to merge it here. Zargulon 17:08, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree, it is not a non orientable worm hole.

Alice Universe

Normal matter: A charge differencial discription.

e +2
e +
N
P +

From N to e+, e+ acts like an electron. From e+2 to e+, e+ acts like a proton.

Now we do the same thing for N

From P+ to N, N acts like an electron. From e+ to N, N acts like a proton.

N would be an Alice interface.

But does it, for orbital shells? It does. 2 electrons per orbital. An electron entering into the orbital space of single/paired electron is both attracted and repelled, depending on if the orbital is a single electron or a dual electron (exclusion principle).

Seems there is some confusion between mirror matter and antimatter

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Mirror_matter ShagaONhan (talk) 12:31, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What if non-orientability is through mirror reflection in time direction?

The article focuses on applied P symmetry, but in general relativity time is as good coordinate as space - couldn't going through such non-orientable wormhole apply T symmetry instead: switch past and future lightcones? --Jarek Duda (talk) 14:52, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]