Talk:New Year's Eve (2011 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Romance Low‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romance, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional romance in literature and romantic fiction writers. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.RomanceWikipedia:WikiProject RomanceTemplate:WikiProject Romanceromance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Low‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

Archive 1

Cast sourcing

There is an internal comment in the Cast section of the article not to add cast members unless there is a source supporting the addition. That includes adding anything about the cast member. For example, Abigail Breslin has a source saying she will be in the movie, but it does NOT say what character she will be playing. Indeed, the source says it wasn't known. Thus, we can put Breslin in as a cast member, but we can't put in a character name. Finally, IMDb is not a reliable source for this sort of information. If editors insert unsourced information, it will be removed. If enough people do it, the article may have to be protected.--Bbb23 (talk) 19:56, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I saw Jim Belushi in a commercial, but I can't find any sources.Thegeniusboy05 (talk) 02:20, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

well belushi is in it but i cant remember sienna miller being there. 86.180.224.207 (talk) 01:48, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There is a cast list on the official web site. This is an occasion on which we should get the facts from the most reliable source. Occasionally WP articles mention an actor as uncredited, in which case another reliable source must be used, but for film articles the film credits are normally taken as the only and sufficient source for the cast list. --AJHingston (talk) 10:25, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Rotten Tomatoes

I appreciate the revert. Putting RT as a external link just makes it easier for when critical reception does actually happen. When reviews come out it should can be moved as a citation instead of a el but right now it's just as sufficient of a external link than IMDb. It's just good prep. ;) Jhenderson⁷⁷⁷ 20:25, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the post, but I can't say I agree with you. IMDb has information (although not always accurate) on unreleased films, but RT, by its very nature, does not. But don't worry, I won't argue for its removal even after my 24-hour period expires (heh). If you feel it's a good idea, fine - it certainly doesn't do any harm.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:32, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just mentioned this on the talk page. Rotten Tomatoes does have news information related on the particular film page. And those are reliable information compared to what IMDb has. Just check for "Latest News for New Years Eve" on the article. ;) Jhenderson⁷⁷⁷ 20:40, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Aah, thanks for pointing that out ... and for being so civil about it.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:01, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Likewise. :) Jhenderson⁷⁷⁷ 00:28, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Box Office

If this section was deleted because neither source said that its opening did not live up to expectations, then I fixed it. Sb1990 (talk) 17:32, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That was most of it. The rest, even though it bothers me, does not justify its removal. I have combined it with reception section and made a few edits to it, though. In particular, an "as of" date for the box office will be nothing but trouble, so I've removed it.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:57, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cast

No Matthew Brodewick and Ryan Seacrest crediting? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.25.144.223 (talk) 16:33, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do Not Remove Sequel!

Stop that! If you remove the sequel, i will call the administrators to block you for 90 days! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:C:780:537:D32:9D3D:D6AD:99 (talk) 19:50, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RELEASE????

Why the freak does the page say it was released 2015?!?!?!?!?

Semi-protected edit request on 1 January 2016

This edit request to New Year's Eve (film) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The "original release date" of the movie, in the second paragraph of the article is incorrect. It was released in 2011 not 2015. Thanks! 70.210.9.52 (talk) 03:38, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done thanks for pointing that out - Arjayay (talk) 13:48, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (February 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on New Year's Eve (2011 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120229190721/http://www.razzies.com/history/32ndNoms.asp to http://www.razzies.com/history/32ndNoms.asp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:04, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]