Talk:New Hampshire Liberty Alliance

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

This article was nominated for deletion on 21 October 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

United States: New Hampshire Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	New Hampshire portal This article is supported by WikiProject New Hampshire (assessed as Low-importance).

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: Libertarianism

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Libertarianism portal This article is supported by WikiProject Libertarianism (assessed as Low-importance).

Blogs

I see no reason why political news blogs should be unacceptable as sources for statements about political news.[1] Wikipedia:BLOGS is about reliable sources for expert information on particular fields of knowledge, a different issue entirely.Jsorens (talk) 17:26, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BLOGS seems clear: irrespective of topic, avoid self-published sources unless the author is an established expert in the field. Note that WP:RSN exists to discuss individual cases. Rostz (talk) 03:07, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nhlalogo.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Nhlalogo.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 15 November 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:02, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Question

How is this group both nonpartisan & libertarian at the exact same time? From their own website, it seems like a very libertarian or "conservative" organization. Guy1890 (talk) 01:55, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]