Talk:National Building Code of Canada

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Civil engineering Low‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Civil engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Civil engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Civil engineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Civil engineeringTemplate:WikiProject Civil engineeringCivil engineering
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alberta

The information on Alberta in the Implementation section is far more detailed than for any other province. Should it have its own subsection?--Jrsnbarn (talk) 15:37, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done, along with several other provinces. --DThomsen8 (talk) 01:35, 30 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Provincial codes

The provincial code "implementations" section is very flawed. There is nothing special about Alberta or Ontario versus the other provinces that have created their own codes based on the provincial model. I will come back when I have some more time to properly update all of the provincial/municipal codes information. Right now I will do a light edit to correct some of the glaring errors, but I'll clean it all up a bit later. Webgeer (talk) 00:36, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What about New-Brunswick? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.118.116.102 (talk) 17:47, 17 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

National Codes website states that New Brunswick is adopting NBC 2010 in early 2014, but a quick search doesn't turn up anything confirming this on the NB government's website. Spiegalr (talk) 17:37, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How about http://www.gnb.ca/legis/bill/FILE/56/3/Bill-75-e.htm Extremo88 (talk) 18:47, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

British Columbia has its own provincial building code in addition to Vancouver's Building Bylaw; Implementation section should be updated to reflect this. Spiegalr (talk) 17:37, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've since added a heading for BC (with a subheading for Vancouver). Spiegalr (talk) 16:59, 25 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

History section/ "historic right"

"... In a few cases, municipalities have been given the historic right of writing their own building code ...". It implies that there is something "historic" (i.e.: distinctly memorable) about such a right. I suspect what the author of this sentence meant was that municipalities have historically been given the right. But I don't know enough about the topic to correct it on my own. Terry Thorgaard (talk) 16:45, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on National Building Code of Canada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20101129044618/http://www.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca:80/eng/ibp/irc/ci/v15no3/1.html to http://www.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/eng/ibp/irc/ci/v15no3/1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:17, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]