Jump to content

Talk:National Asset Management Agency

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Timeline of section on Criticism

[edit]

"The criticisms are disputed by the Government. The Tánaiste and Minister for Enterprise, Trade and Employment Mary Coughlan has defended the creation of the agency saying it was not a bailout for the banks, one of the charges made against it.[7]"

It appears strange that the Government's response to the criticisms which were made in July and August 2009 (Notes 10,11 and 12) is supported by a reference to a RTE article dated in April. Perhaps the the second sentence above should read "Speaking to the Daíl on the 9th April 2009, Tánaiste Mary Coughlan said that the National Assets Management Agency is not a bailout for the banks." Scartboy (talk) 23:43, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is about ensuring people can access credit

[edit]

I didn't think the quote adds much, especially in an introduction; the Bill is very clear that this is its purpose, so I just changed it to It is proposed that NAMA ..., primarily with a view to improving the availability of credit markmc (talk) 17:22, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

...and bailing out the banks and developers ;-) Snappy (talk) 19:36, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Exactly - the quote from the Minister makes it sound like a matter of opinion what NAMA is intended to achieve, whereas the bill sets out its intentions very clearly. Now, it's certainly a matter of great debate what the bill will achieve, but that debate can be covered in the criticisms section.
Basically, I think the quote in the starts the article off on a quite a non-neutral footing. See WP:AVOID markmc (talk) 19:50, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Agreed, I have removed said quote. Snappy (talk) 23:18, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Snappy! markmc (talk) 17:33, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ROI

[edit]

Snappy, why do you insist on inserting "Irish economy" when you know NAMA is aimed at the ROI alone? Lapsed Pacifist (talk) 19:32, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand your question. The name of this country is Ireland, therefore Irish economy. Snappy (talk) 19:52, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The name of the state might be Ireland, but as you know, the state is not Ireland. You're introducing an unnecessary ambiguity. Lapsed Pacifist (talk) 20:10, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Snappy. I don't see the ambiguity. The article begins with references to the Government of Ireland, the Irish financial crisis and the Irish property bubble. Why is the reference to the Irish economy more ambiguous than those? markmc (talk) 21:11, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
There's no ambiguity when talking about an "economy". "Economies" are usually spoken of in terms of state. --rannṗáirtí anaiṫnid (coṁrá) 23:08, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think Lapsed Pacifist is right, it just clears things up a lot more. Yes people who come onto this page will generally know that 'Ireland' in this context is referring to the Republic, but for someone who knows nothing about NAMA or its aims, it minimises confusion and ambiguity to highlight that the article is about the Republic. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 123dylan456 (talkcontribs) 16:49, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on National Asset Management Agency. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:58, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on National Asset Management Agency. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:57, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 11 external links on National Asset Management Agency. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:51, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on National Asset Management Agency. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:51, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]