Talk:My Life as a 10-Year-Old Boy/GA1
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This article is in decent shape, but it needs more work before it becomes a Good Article.
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Question: In the Background section, is this ---> "My Life as a 10-year Boy", the title she had in mind before the book was published?
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- In the Content section, you might want to correctly link "Tom Jones" to its correspondence article.
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- In the Content section, it wouldn't hurt to add a book source to ---> "The final chapter is a retrospective in which she answers the question "what is it like to be the voice behind the star?", since it is a quote from the book.
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Not much to do. If the statements above can be answered, I will pass the article. Good luck with improving this article!
- Pass or Fail:
-- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 01:40, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- "Question: In the Background section, is this ---> "My Life as a 10-year Boy", the title she had in mind before the book was published?"
- Yes. It could just be a typo, but it's in several articles.
- "In the Content section, you might want to correctly link "Tom Jones" to its correspondence article."
- Done.
- "In the Content section, it wouldn't hurt to add a book source to ---> "The final chapter is a retrospective in which she answers the question "what is it like to be the voice behind the star?", since it is a quote from the book."
- Done.
- Thanks a lot for the review. -- Scorpion0422 01:55, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
- Check (on all of the above). You're welcome for the review. Thank you to Scorpion for getting the stuff I left at the talk page, because I have gone off and placed the article as GA. Congrats. ;) -- ThinkBlue (Hit BLUE) 15:45, 16 February 2009 (UTC)