Talk:Monster Dog
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Monster Dog article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
References
[edit]This page needs to site its references but I don't know the template for it.--DestructoTalk to me 02:02, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
March 2019 update
[edit]I've done a pretty big overhaul of the article. I removed sources linking to message boards and what appear to be fansites, tightened some others. The biggest change and perhaps most controversial is the release and infobox items. Roberto Curti's 2019 book clears up some items, namely that the film does not seem to have ever been released theatrically in Italy as it was never passed to the screening board. Its earliest release dates to an American home video release. It did seem to have a theatrical release in Span as well which was added. Curti's sources also state that the film was 100% financed by Spanish production means, so I have reflected this in the article. Please feel free to discuss here as this is quite different than other sources (which Curti calls out, specifically IMDb and other reference books). Andrzejbanas (talk) 05:02, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
red links
[edit]the article has to much red links --79.193.88.83 (talk) 18:27, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
Little Known Fact
[edit]Monster Dog was THE TRIUMPH of 1984!!! Winning multiple awards all over Europe!! His ability to be a 36 yr.old man, and yet step into the shoes of a novice teen age musician, astounded audiences all over Spain and lower parts of Italy!!!! Queen Jolie (talk) 22:45, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
23 June 2023
[edit]I appreciate the work that you have done on this article, Andrzejbanas. However, you reverted all of my edits on the “Production” section with the explanation “previous phrasing was better”. The text to which you reverted was, in my opinion, not that well-written, with issues such as repeated usage of words, which is why I edited it originally. I have decided to revert your reversion. If you still take issue with some of the phrasing, I respectfully suggest that you fix those specific problems, since reverting my edits wholesale again would restore those issues that existed previously.
Your other recent edit was marked “shouldn’t use IMDb as a source”. I appreciate your pointing that out. Your edit itself, though, rather than removing the IMDb citation, replaced the first paragraph of the “Production” section with the previous version of the first paragraph from the “Release” section. Therefore, I am reverting that edit also—but removing the citation of IMDb as well, as was your stated intention.
I leave it up to you do what you see fit. I shan’t be checking back on the article.
Thank you, Quick and Dirty User Account (talk) 07:58, 23 June 2023 (UTC)