Talk:Molly Brant/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Magic♪piano 23:13, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   All web sources (e.g. the Graymont DCB bio) should have access dates.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   Photos of statuary and other inauthentic imagery of her would be a welcome addition. Somebody may need to go to Kingston if there really is a statue there; I wasn't able to find any online pictures of it.

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

I know it's a nit, but I had to find something to complain about. Magic♪piano 22:13, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Accessdates added. I've been looking through flickr for any statues or signs for Brant. There are a few on there, but they're all copyrighted pictures. I'll send a message to those that took the photos to try and get the copyright changed, but no guarantees. Wizardman _{Operation Big Bear} 02:25, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

Sure thing. Passing... Magic♪piano 14:09, 19 October 2010 (UTC)