Talk:Moida Mansion
 | Moida Mansion has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: January 10, 2025. (Reviewed version). |
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Moida Mansion/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Vrxces (talk · contribs) 03:39, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: BigLordFlash (talk · contribs) 22:01, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Hello! I will review this article. If you have any questions just talk to me on my talk page. BigLordFlashtalk 22:02, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- I left some comments below. BigLordFlashtalk 22:29, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- Nothing wrong here. BigLordFlashtalk 22:29, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- It has a list of all references. BigLordFlashtalk 22:29, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- I did a spot-check below. BigLordFlashtalk 22:29, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- C. It contains no original research:
- No original research. BigLordFlashtalk 22:29, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- No copyright violations (Earwig) BigLordFlashtalk 22:29, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- All the main aspects are addressed. BigLordFlashtalk 22:29, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- It stays focused on the topic. BigLordFlashtalk 22:29, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It's totally neutral. BigLordFlashtalk 22:29, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It is stable. BigLordFlashtalk 22:29, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- No copyright issues. BigLordFlashtalk 22:29, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- Images have suitable captions. BigLordFlashtalk 22:29, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Comments
[edit]- The monster's name is referred to as "The Monsta" in one instance and "Monsta" in others. Ensure consistency in naming. BigLordFlashtalk 22:29, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
- "Pope created the game after a series of similar titles, including a 2023 remake of Papers Please." could be clearer as
"Pope developed the game after releasing similar titles, including a 2023 remake of Papers Please."
BigLordFlashtalk 22:29, 8 January 2025 (UTC) - "Following release, Moida Mansion received praise for the resemblance to LCD handheld game displays, and the variety of its puzzles within the limitations of its visual design." should be
"Following its release, Moida Mansion received praise for its resemblance to LCD handheld game displays and the variety of its puzzles within the limitations of its visual design."
BigLordFlashtalk 22:29, 8 January 2025 (UTC)- Hi! I did (2) and (3). I also suggest numerically aligning references and adding archives. Though outside GAC scope, we can also improve ref formatting by wikilinks and redundancy of website-publisher RFNirmala (talk) 12:14, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
- I have already archived the references. BigLordFlashtalk 13:22, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
Spot-check
[edit]Based on this version
It's a very well written article, without any problems, and meets the criteria for Good Article. I will pass this one. Congratulations! BigLordFlashtalk 13:22, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Translation into the Chinese Wikipedia
[edit]The version 10 January 2025 13:46 UTC was translated into the Chinese Wikipedia. --For Each element In group ... Next 07:27, 22 January 2025 (UTC)