Talk:Mohamad Jawad Chirri

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mohamad Jawad Chirri article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Islam: Muslim scholars

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Muslim scholars task force.

Is this sentence ok to have in a wikipedia article: "It was a great dream that had come true!"? Possibly biased? A. Scholar (Nabu) (talk) 02:15, 5 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

strange phrasing and palpable bias

This sounds translated or is written by a non-native speaker. In addition, it's not neutral, and is written from a point of view of praise rather than objective observation. Mohamad Jawad Chirri may very well be a great man, but it is not the job of an encyclopedia to try to convince people, rather, to give facts and have the readers interpret them. Even the way it starts is suspiciously propagandic... "Like many pioneers through known time..."

It sounds less like an attempt at objectivity and more of a desire to spin or create a narrative. Plus you need to cite some sources. I'm going to try and make this better — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rubecuber (talk • contribs) 23:16, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]