Talk:Mining simulator
Appearance
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
References
[edit]This article is not referenced, not objective and in my opinion used for marketing. I've seen better articles than this being deleted from wikipedia. Look at the revision history, it's a joke —Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.209.13.170 (talk • contribs) 12:52, 15 March 2008
- (Have a look at {{sofixit}}).
- But it is a valid topic... I've added an 'unref' banner to highlight your concerns.
- As for the external links, it is no worse having links to the few companies that write this software than it is on a digger page have links to digger manufacturers. As long as they are all represented equally, and don't make advertising claims. (Not sure that this is entirely within the letter of WP:EL, but it is the yardstick I use when testing such links for compliance, as such links are useful on a page that is supposed to be giving complete coverage to a topic.)
- EdJogg (talk) 10:08, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- Hello @EdJogg, I hope you're doing well. I thought I'd ping you just for fun after 14 years to say all of the issues you addressed should be fixed now 🙂 Cheers! Johnson524 (Talk!) 07:26, 19 December 2022 (UTC)