This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Israel, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Israel on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IsraelWikipedia:WikiProject IsraelTemplate:WikiProject IsraelIsrael-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
Hi. The title is wrong. I guess in Israel somebody extrapolated from the better-known Qal'at Nimrud and came up with Qal'at al-Mina. Or tried to make sense of it ("castle of the port" sounds more logical for a fort than "port of the castle").
But it's Arabic, and Arabs call it Minat al-Qal'a, at leat that's what all serious literature is telling us. Fact. See at D. Pringle, Andrew Petersen, Nicolle, Raphael Patai (links below) and all other trustworthy scholars and researchers. It is possible that a "Khirbet" got lost on the way, which would make it "the ruins at the port with the castle", but that's speculation and goes too far. Plus, Ashdod-on-the Sea has many more ruins than the "recent" Fatimid fort.
I would have changed it right away, but I lack the technical skills :)
Also, "Azotus paraliyus" was invented by some WP editor who transliterated from Hebrew and now the Web is full of it. Correct it is "Azotus paralios" (from the Greek word παράλιος), and in Latinised form "Azotus paralius" if smb. dislikes Greek. Don't take it from me, take it from the Israeli scholar R. Patai (third URL here-below, p 145 first paragraph). The "iy" or "yi" and even "yyi" are English attempts to write Hebrew and Arabic words (Ziyon/Ziyyon, Saffuriyeh) and are never needed for Greek or Latin words.
Yes, we need to change it. Survey of Palestine maps always called it, with some spelling variations, "Minat el Qilat (Minat Isdud)". What spelling for the article title do you propose? Also, I'm not sure we should capitalise the "al". Zerotalk04:34, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
As per the discussion above, the article name is now Minat al-Qal'a. Now I wonder about the text "sometimes wrongly named Qal'at al-Mina". Is it just a blunder that Wikipedia introduced? If so, we should just delete mention of it rather than perpetrating it as even an extant wrong name. Zerotalk02:15, 24 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
