Talk:Miguel Santiago

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group.

California: Los Angeles Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force.

United States: Hispanic and Latino / State Legislatures Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Hispanic and Latino Americans portal This article is supported by the Hispanic and Latino Americans task force.
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. State Legislatures.

University of California Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to University of California, its history, accomplishments and other topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.University of CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject University of CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject University of CaliforniaUniversity of California articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This page is within the scope of the UC Los Angeles task force. New members are always welcome!

[Untitled]

This sentence misleads readers and leaves out important context and should be changed.

"Santiago's amendments removed all provisions of the bill's net neutrality rules that exceeded those previously established by Barack Obama in 2015"

This should be "Santiago's amendments removed all provisions of the bill's net neutrality protections that were in the text of the 2015 Open Internet Order, leaving only those that were in the two-pages of rules."

Santiago's amendments removed all provisions of the bill that were in the 277-page body of the 2015 Net Neutrality Order, which contained important, legally binding protections. The point of SB 822 was to restore all the protections, including those in the text of the order that explains the rules.

Cite: https://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blog/2018/06/failing-real-test-sb-822-no-longer-restores-all-lost-net-neutrality-protections

Talking only about the rules is misleading. The Order is just as legally binding and when ISPs sued against the 2015 protections, they sued the Order, not the rules https://www.cadc.uscourts.gov/internet/opinions.nsf/3F95E49183E6F8AF85257FD200505A3A/$file/15-1063-1619173.pdf

The original sentence is misleading as it doesn't tell readers that Santiago stripped out protections that the Obama administration had included. SB 822 as amended is *not* the same as the 2015 Internet Order and is significantly weaker.

https://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blog/2018/06/failing-real-test-sb-822-no-longer-restores-all-lost-net-neutrality-protections SMSLWren (talk) 20:23, 26 June 2018 (UTC) SMSLWren[reply]

I agree and have made the change. Ahjotina (talk) 00:29, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Ahjotina for making the change.

There is one other inaccurracy in the article:

"The vote was approved 8-2[6] by the Communications and Conveyance committee, which Santiago chairs, on June 21, 2018, at 10 pm, before Wiener could argue against them."

This mangles the timeline and votes, and even gets the date wrong.

1) The committee amendments were published on June 19 at ~10 p.m. ^[1] 2) The vote to approve the amendments happened at the start of the hearing on June 20, which started at 9:30 a.m. The vote on adopting the amendments was 8-0. This happened before the testimony. You can see this in the video: ^[2] Start at 35:00, and the vote tally of 8-0 simply on the amendments comes at 37:22. 3) After the vote and his testimony, Wiener attempted to withdraw his bill, but was not allowed to. The committee then voted to approve the amended bill with an 8-2 vote. ^[3]

The below is accurate: "The amendments, published less than 12 hours before the hearing, were approved 8-0[6] by the Communications and Conveyance committee, which Santiago chairs, on June 20, 2018. That vote occurred before Wiener could argue against them and before any testimony. After the testimony, the amended bill was approved 8-2."

SMSLWren (talk) 01:45, 28 June 2018 (UTC)SMLSWren[reply]

Thanks. I've amended that sentence. I added your sources to the citation, but I'm in a hurry so perhaps they can be consolidated. Ahjotina (talk) 02:10, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs to be updated to show that Santiago ended up co-sponsoring legislation to protect net neutrality. Ahjotina (talk) 19:23, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

[1] ttp://sd11.senate.ca.gov/news/20180620-senator-wiener%E2%80%99s-statement-gutting-net-neutrality-bill-assembly-committee

[2] ttp://calchannel.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=7&clip_id=5632

[3] ttps://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billVotesClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180SB822

[1]

[2]

[3]