Talk:Metal Fatigue (video game)

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Twenty stories?

The main units in Metal Fatigue are twenty-story tall "Combots," which can be configured and customized part-by-part and dominate the game. Where did this info come from? If you look at the pilot unit ingame a combot is something like 3 or four stories maybe. Pharod42 22:45, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Look at the cinematics or the cover. The pilot unit is only so big, because you have to be able to select them. Like in many other strategy games humans are generally to big compared to other units, houses etc. --80.138.117.242 16:48, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I still have my Metal Fatigue manual. I'll look it up now. 72.192.54.23 (talk) 23:43, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Combots

Combots are large, highly mobile robots that are extremely versatile and very powerful."

That's the only mention of Combot size I saw in the manual. Removing the twenty stories thing. 72.192.54.23 (talk) 23:48, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Success in Europe?

According to the GamePro review [1], Metal Fatigue was "a smash hit" in Europe. The article suggests that it bombed in general.—Graf Bobby (talk) 23:03, 2 August 2008 (UTC) well, it certainly was a "smash hit" in Tønsberg - Norway, me and my brothers and many of my friends played this game ^^ Divinity76 (talk) 15:11, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Three areas

I think it is also worth to mention that the game takes place at three areas at the same time (subsurface, surface, space) and you can travel between them. – 91.4.12.217 (talk) 16:24, 13 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I will butcher this article

sorry about thisAuricBlofeld (talk) 02:25, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Refs

http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-616901_ITM

http://www.avault.com/reviews/pc/metal-fatigue/

http://www.gamespot.com/pc/strategy/metalfatigue/index.html

http://pc.ign.com/objects/010/010250.html

http://download.nytimes.com/Metal-Fatigue-demo/9100-7562_4-10041036.html?tag=tab_pub

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/metalfatigue

AuricBlofeld (talk) 02:39, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Further Improvement

For any of you interested, I suggest that a reception section be created. and perhaps a story.AuricBlofeld (talk) 04:24, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Metal Fatigue (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110615201328/http://www.avault.com/reviews/pc/metal-fatigue/2/ to http://www.avault.com/reviews/pc/metal-fatigue/2/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:57, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]