Talk:Medusa: Dare to Be Truthful

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Medusa: Dare to Be Truthful article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Madonna Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Madonna, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Madonna on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MadonnaWikipedia:WikiProject MadonnaTemplate:WikiProject MadonnaMadonna articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Protected

This page has been protected because of a request made by User:XLR8TION who claims that User:74.197.86.10 is involved in edit-warring, destroying it with unconstructive entries that contain pointless information and bad grammar. All parties interested in the subject are encouraged to discuss the issue here. Tony the Marine (talk) 02:52, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, earlier today I blocked that IP address for a week. Tan | 39 03:03, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tanthalas has blocked the IP for a week. Is protection really needed?--Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 12:07, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When there is evidence of an edit-war going on without a proper discussion of the parties involved, then a temp. protection is used as a means to keep the situation from excalating into a heated situation (cooling-off period) that is why all the parties invovled have been notified to participate in a civil discussion in this page with the objective that all issues will be sorted out, before the unprotection of the page. I do suggest that User:74.197.86.10 be unblocked so that he/she can participate. Tony the Marine (talk) 18:16, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would feel safer moving the discussion to his talk page so we don't risk more destruction.--Gordonrox24 | ^Talk 18:38, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unprotecting

All the parties involved in the war-editing of this article were notified to participate in this page to sort out their differences, however as I see that no one has shown an interest in doing so, I have unprotected this page. Good luck to you all. Tony the Marine (talk) 22:45, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you people block me? I was editing this article, and I couldn't edit any article, except my talk page. I was editing Wikipedia, and editing Wikipedia is NOT A BAD THING. Why did Tanthlas39 block me? I was NOT disruptly editing wikipedia, as I was editing the article, giving the article a plot section. It WAS NOT pointless info. And my spelling was correct. I need an explanation. --74.197.86.10 (talk) 03:08, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]