Jump to content

Talk:Massacre at Thandikulam

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

To the tamil nation/net/com/org/co.uk/ne.jp editor

[edit]

This is Wikipedia. Please bare (this)in you mind when you edit here.Thanks Iwazaki 会話。討論 06:18, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly. No need to bring up OR and weasel wording then Iwazaki. If you can provide reference saying that "This massacre happened when the ltte blew up the truck" (implying that the LTTE did this) rather than "Army shot students close range" you can add that to the article. Keep in mind that the former is added below and has no need to be in the main paragraph. Also I suggest you read WP:NPA thank you Watchdogb 22:02, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 22

[edit]

Article says "Initially the Pro LTTE media put the blame on the government saying the army had entered the Thandikulam Agriculture Farm School, lined up the uniformed hostel students and shot at them blank range after the explosion[6] and later it was followed by the international media agencies and by the Sri Lanka Monitoring Mission.[2]". So it includes the SLMM's quote and everything. Thanks --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ walkie-talkie 17:58, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look at the lead in now ?Taprobanus 18:41, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I would like to know two things regarding the last edits of yours.

1 I feel theres no need of citing the tamilnet.com link to back-up the Initially the Pro rebel LTTE media placed the blame... section because I gave the satp.org link with the intention of citing for that sentence.

SATP and Tamilnet both are potentially biased sources, so if SATP accuses the pro rebel media of alleging the massacre, we need pro rebel media to agree with it, otherwise it is simply one side of the story. This is according to what User: Llywrch said hereTaprobanus 13:24, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2 How about stopping the intro from [...] personnel in camouflage uniforms. ? I feel I have covered well, regarding those personnel in camouflage uniforms from the depth of the NPOV tone in /Allegations towards responsibility and regarding the investigation on /Investigation section. I'm sure the current intro will mislead the readers until they coming to the bottom of the article. --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ walkie-talkie 03:49, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

From WP:LEAD “Next to establishing context, the lead section should briefly summarize the most important points covered in an article in such a way that it can stand on its own as a concise version of the article (e.g. when a related article gives a brief overview of the topic in question). It is even more important here than for the rest of the article that the text be accessible, and consideration should be given to creating interest in reading the whole article (see news style and summary style). The first sentence in the lead section should be a concise definition of the topic unless that definition is implied by the title (such as 'History of …' and similar titles).” So what are the important facts of the article?
Hmm shall we archive the discussion then ;-) --♪♫ ĽąĦĩŘǔ ♫♪ walkie-talkie 05:12, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for writing a neutral article :)))Taprobanus 17:47, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Massacre at Thandikulam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:18, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Massacre at Thandikulam. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:44, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]