Talk:Maryam Faghihimani

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Iran

	Iran portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Copy Editing

I believe I have addressed the issue the page being too much a listing of her academic achievements. As such I hope I have resolved the issue. If more needs to be done I would gladly collaborate with someone. DaltonCastle (talk) 03:36, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Now on to the notability issue. I will search for more sources. I do believe her to be a notable individual given her media coverage to date. Nonetheless I will search for more. DaltonCastle (talk) 04:31, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for acting on my suggestion. Currently the most promising independent reliable references (Boston Herald, Tablet) are used to cite facts about her personal life, whereas her professional career as an academician, activist and writer is what she is supposed to be notable of - I would like independent references support these claims rather than references that are clearly not independent of her (LinkedIn profile, CCDD, Professional Women). Finnusertop (talk | guestbook | contribs) 06:47, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, you are absolutely right. I will get right on this. DaltonCastle (talk) 07:13, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I believe I have addressed the notability issue with the addition of new reliable sources. Hope its good to go now. DaltonCastle (talk) 19:34, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

@Nerd1956: hello there! Thank you for reaching out. What in particular are you hoping to add to the article? My main concern was that your edit removed a considerable portion of reliably sourced content. What specifically needs to be added, in your opinion? I'd be happy to collaborate. DaltonCastle (talk) 01:54, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]