This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
It seems to me that this article does not have a NPOV. I know nothing about Mary O'Grady, but to me, this article seems very biased against her. Any thoughts?
Rising*From*Ashes (talk) 02:09, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Er.. Have you actually read what she publishes? I used to work at the WSJ, met her, and read her columns for the past 8 years. They are somewhat of a mix of nutty right wing fanatic, and fairy tale history. My complaint about this Wiki entry is that it is barely anything at all. I can get more information about Britney Spears' shoe polisher than I can about this person. makes you wonder, why the secrecy and lack of information. Hmmm? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.40.57.118 (talk) 21:42, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I rewrote the criticism section recently added to this article by User:Hanzon, as it did not comply with Wikipedia's policies on neutral point of view and biographies of living persons. All negative statements about living people must be sourced, and Wikipedia should not take positions on controversies ourselves. For example, we can say that she has been accused of making inaccurate statements in her reporting, but should not state this allegation as fact. Robofish (talk) 17:00, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
As it stands, the current criticism section is problematic. It neither sources the claims by the critics nor does it cite any reliable source saying these critics' claims are unfounded. There's just no reason to think, given what we have here, that critics don't have proof of their allegations. We'd need some RS who says that such proof has not been provided.2601:47:4200:542:CAF7:33FF:FE77:D800 (talk) 21:11, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
.jpg){kind=small}