Talk:Marjorie (song)
Appearance
Marjorie (song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: December 26, 2024. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Marjorie (song) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Marjorie (song) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 January 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Marjorie (song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Medxvo (talk · contribs) 10:52, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: CatchMe (talk · contribs) 06:05, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Ref 1 doesn't specifically support the preceding sentence as ref 2 does.
- Removed it, please tell me if I should replace it with another source
- The ref supports the sentence completely so it's fine as it is!
- Removed it, please tell me if I should replace it with another source
- "...
the pop maximalist sound
..." - "the maximalist pop sound"?- Done
- "
After filming, the three celebrated by drinking and unexpectedly continued writing
..." - is the drinking part relevant?- Replaced with "celeberated Folklore's success and and unexpectedly ..."
- "...
was composed from
..." - "was composed using"?- Done
- I have seen GAs using "synthesizers" instead of "synths".
- Done
- "...
and one of Swift's better songs
" - "and one of Swift's best songs".- Done
- "
nine out of 274
" - change "nine" to "9" for consistency and per MOS:NUMNOTES.- Done. I completely forgot about MOS:NUMNOTES
This article is almost perfect for GA! I didn't even had to separate in sections as I usually do.. All good in the verifiable (and no copyright violations according to Earwig's Copyvio), broad, neutral, stable, and illustrated criteria. I will put this On hold until some minor issues are addressed! CatchMe (talk · contribs) 06:05, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- Hey, CatchMe! I believe I've addressed all of your comments, let me know if anything needs further adjustments. Thanks so much for the review, I greatly appreciate it :)) Medxvo (talk) 07:11, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Medxvo: Excellent work! I see everything is fine so I will ✓ Pass this. Congrats and happy holidays!! CatchMe (talk · contribs) 15:50, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Music good articles
- GA-Class song articles
- GA-Class Taylor Swift articles
- Low-importance Taylor Swift articles
- WikiProject Taylor Swift articles
- GA-Class Women in music articles
- Low-importance Women in music articles
- WikiProject Women in Music articles
- Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors
- WikiProject Women in Red meetup 150 articles
- All WikiProject Women in Red pages
- Wikipedia Did you know articles