Talk:Marie Tharp/Archive 1

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 January 2019 and 11 April 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Danaelawrence, Evodiemakasa, Nathalia.paez.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:34, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Hdhillon15, Jordanwilson678, Kiera.davidson98, Jennabower.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:23, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tacitus Complicitus?

What does this mean?

The Story of the Remarkable Woman Who Mapped the Ocean Floor". It was cited by the New York Times for its standing as an "eloquent testament both to Tharp’s importance and to Felt’s powers of imagination."

That her historian helped the story along? We have her own words for that:

https youtu.be /QcaIP6NqZTI?t=494

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QcaIP6NqZTI&feature=youtu.be&t=494

Weatherlawyer (talk) 18:37, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Less patriarchal / patronizing cover photo for article

This main article photo shows Bruce Hezeen in a pose suggesting he's instructing Marie Tharp. Although Hezeen was very important in providing support to Tharp, she brought the vision and the persistence to prove the existence of the Mid Atlantic Rift. Hezeen was no more important than any of the 20 or so women who worked alongside Tharp.

May I suggest a photo where Tharp stands alone? Perhaps photographer Bruce Gilbert will give permission to use a beautiful 2001 shot on Columbia University's website?

http://earth.columbia.edu/news/2006/images/MTHARPbg1_400.jpg

Here are other URLs referencing that photo:

http://www.earth.columbia.edu/news/2006/story08-24-06.php http://blogs.agu.org/georneys/2010/12/24/a-famous-ocean-floor-map/

Or another photo could be selected. With a campaign on women scientists in STEM (#WomenInSTEM) trending on Twitter so we can make girls feel they have a future in the sciences, a less patriarchal cover photo for this article is in order. 96.27.104.7 (talk) 04:18, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I found a public domain photo

Please change the photo. I don't have an account and I'm incompetent to edit Wiki, but that photo has got to go. It's patronizing, and she's a feminist icon.

Here's a public domain photo credited to the Library of Congress

http://static01.nyt.com/images/2013/01/27/books/review/27WASHBURN/27WASHBURN-blog427.jpg

Published on the New York Times website here

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/01/27/books/review/soundings-about-marie-tharp-by-hali-felt.html?_r=0

96.27.104.7 (talk) 04:36, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Marie Tharp. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:13, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Marie Tharp. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060907150020/http://www.earth.columbia.edu/news/2006/story08-24-06.php to http://www.earth.columbia.edu/news/2006/story08-24-06.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:28, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Page mentioned as example of gender bias

This Marie Tharp page was mentioned in a 2015 New Statesman article on Gender bias in Wikipedia. Including citation here in case it is notable. https://www.newstatesman.com/lifestyle/2015/05/wikipedia-has-colossal-problem-women-dont-edit-it SunnyBoi SunnyBoi (talk) 12:36, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

that is a bit mischaracterizing. the article in newstatesman is about gender bias in Wikipedia. And this wikipedia page appears in the newstatesman article. but this article is not mentioned as any sort of example of gender bias in wikipedia, just a page that someone in the article has edited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.220.7.244 (talk) 01:21, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image replaced

FYI, I've just replaced the image used in the infobox of this article. The photo it replaces, File:Tharp & Heezen.jpg, is likewise a non-free photo, and has a couple problems as people have noted elsewhere on this talk page. For one, it's a profile that actually shows less of the subject. Second, the image appears to be Heezen teaching Tharp about the map as though the map isn't her work. Seems like a fine image for his article, where it is still used, but there's this great image of her that's better in both respects. Thanks to Akgcd523 for identifying the opportunity and the better image. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 15:07, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Image

The image used at present is fair use. We have "Marie Tharp working with fathometer record (cropped).jpg" image of her, this is not contentious and it is free to use. Marie Tharp's estate needs to give permission for us to use their image, which I agree is much better. Victuallers (talk) 13:58, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Like BTW,although the previous picture looks better...--ZhaoFJx (talk) 14:09, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Like

Thank you for finding the one with Public Domain. Thanks to that, I can also place the photo in the article in Japanese Wikipedia where we are prohibited from using fair-use photos.

The previous photo could be used in another place in the article if it's not an issue. It was also a nice color photo and makes us feel more alive. shuuji3 (talk) 15:16, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Missing topic

Hi everyone!

I was wondering if there is any missing topic in Mary Tharp biography that really needs to be covered.

Thank you! Elaine Marley-Threepwood (talk) 08:22, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]