Talk:Margaret Booth

Margaret Booth has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: October 23, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as High-importance).

Women's History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women in Business Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles about women in business on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject Women in BusinessTemplate:WikiProject Women in BusinessWomen in Business
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): ItsAka. Peer reviewers: ThatWriterWithBangs, LightSkin.Cis.Girl, Sweatervestcool.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:20, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Margaret Booth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/614ten37o?url=http://wif.org/past-recipients to http://wif.org/past-recipients
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.editorsguild.com/v2/magazine/archives/0306/cover_story.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:43, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

____________________________________________

While it can definitely be challenging to find some information on directors, I feel you could have detailed more of Booth's films she was apart of and how she came to be apart of them. On top of this more links could have been added to the articles she'd done over having the article highlighted of where she was buried. However with what detail you'd discovered you kept the article very to the perspective of third person, and highlighting basic info on Margaret Booth in the small box was a very nice touch. Sweatervestcool (talk) 19:25, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

Passed. IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:32, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Margaret Booth/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: PrinceArchelaus (talk · contribs) 20:44, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: IntentionallyDense (talk · contribs) 03:01, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this soon. IntentionallyDense (talk) 03:01, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	The prose looks good here I have no complaints. IntentionallyDense (talk) 03:48, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	IntentionallyDense (talk) 03:48, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	IntentionallyDense (talk) 03:48, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	I'm unable to access some of the sources due to IA being down but I'll verify what I can. I checked the online sources and downloaded the books used through other means. IntentionallyDense (talk) 03:48, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
	2c. it contains no original research.	IntentionallyDense (talk) 03:48, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	IntentionallyDense (talk) 03:48, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	IntentionallyDense (talk) 03:48, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	IntentionallyDense (talk) 03:48, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	IntentionallyDense (talk) 03:48, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	IntentionallyDense (talk) 03:48, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	IntentionallyDense (talk) 03:48, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	IntentionallyDense (talk) 03:48, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
	7. Overall assessment.	Because of IA being down I'm going to put this on hold until I can check some of the sources more. IntentionallyDense (talk) 03:48, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply] I wasn't able to do as thorough of a source check due to the archive being down but based on my other spot checks things look good. The prose is good, the article is neutral, and the detail level is appropriate. IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:31, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The link for ref 19 is giving me a 404 error just a heads up. IntentionallyDense (talk) 03:48, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is a reference in the works cited section that appears to be unused. IntentionallyDense (talk) 03:48, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I can't access the Unterberger ref due to IA being down and I can't find anything by that name in the websites I use to download books. I'm going to hope that IA is up and running soon just because that source is used for a good chunk of this article, but until then I'm going to mark the source review on hold and continue with the rest of my review. IntentionallyDense (talk) 03:48, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The Brownlow 1968 source isn't verifying the info present but this may be an issue with the version I downloaded. IntentionallyDense (talk) 03:48, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Which of the Brownlow citations are you referring to? PrinceArchelaus (talk) 05:14, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Both. IntentionallyDense (talk) 06:38, 20 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

PrinceArchelaus If you don't address this within the next few days I will have to close this review as unsuccessful. IntentionallyDense (talk) 02:56, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Internet Archive is still down, but thankfully I can verify with Google Books. The listed citations verify the quotes given. Unfortunately, it doesn't show page 303 but the information was exactly on the page. PrinceArchelaus (talk) 05:25, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Good enough for me. IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:30, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
By this time, Booth had graduated from Los Angeles High School. Since this subsection has a date range I think it would be worth specifying when "this time" is. If it isn't in sources then this isn't a big deal. IntentionallyDense (talk) 03:48, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@PrinceArchelaus: There as some issues that need to be addressed before I can move on with this review and the one week timeframe to respond to feedback is running out so I just wanted to remind you that I've put this review on hold. IntentionallyDense (talk) 03:55, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Understood. PrinceArchelaus (talk) 05:01, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.