Jump to content

Talk:Manila Film Center

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Almost all of the article about the "Scaffolding incident"

[edit]

There is nothing in the article about the building itself, as the entire article focuses on the "Scaffolding Incident." Could someone please add more info on the theater? Handtell (talk) 11:50, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done and improved --TitanOne (talk) 19:37, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Government office building?

[edit]

The article says that the film centre is being used as an office building. Is this accurate? I believe that it's been condemned as unsafe, and it was sinking though they lifted the condemnation. I drove by once and I saw that squatters were living there, so it doesn't seem likely that it's a government building.J.J. Bustamante 03:42, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reference void

[edit]

The main reference for the information about the help being banned from the site and that workers caught in the concrete should be sliced in two is a link to a Google Books book which does not show content. Also, I find the claim about slicing workers in two very strange. First, it claims the workers were unconscious. How can you be unconscious after not breathing for nine hours? second, why slice anyone in two? what do you gain by doing so? This section doesn't make sense and doesn't have a reference to back it up; I have accordingly removed it. These are serious claims; they need to make sense and they need a valid reference. Toby Douglass (talk) 02:28, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey I am too lazy to make an account by source 14 is unverifiable and pretty wrong. The link and isbn is bad. Correct link is https://books.google.com/books?id=pMGTCb1Ypk4C&q=ambulances#v=onepage&q=ambulances&f=false (search inside doesn't work for the quote but its at least the right book. The correct isbn is 971-550-435-3 98.118.56.155 (talk) 18:00, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

N.b. I boggle at the very final section, which describes how parapsychologists claim haunting could be due to unburied bodies and untimely death. This is a serious wikipedia article, not a platform. I have removed this section as being of low quality. Toby Douglass (talk) 02:32, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Manila Film Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:27, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Manila Film Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:43, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Manila Film Center. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:03, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:34, 5 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Original New York Times Newspaper

[edit]

This is the original New York Times Newspaper regarding the report of the Manila Film Festival at that time: MANILA FIL FESTIVAL PROVES ALL-OUT SPECTACULAR 小猫头鹰7 (talk) 02:07, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Talk:Manila_Film_Center&oldid=1247499701"