Talk:M-125 (Michigan highway)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dough4872 (talk · contribs) 14:49, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
I would recommend mentioning the road M-125 connects to at the state line in the infobox.

When was Connector M-125 designated?
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

I will put this article on hold for a couple concerns to be addressed. Dough 48 72 15:13, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Connector number can't be traced, at this time, to when it was named. The "Connector 75" number is an internal affair, and a few years ago those numbers were all shuffled. (I can't confirm that this was previously called Connector 2 without resorting to using an SPS.) The CONN M-125 number has never been signed, and thus no map will show when the number was applied, which can only be assumed to be when the M-125 number was applied to the parent highway.

I don't think it's necessary to list that M-125 connects with a city street in the infoboox. If it connected with a numbered CR at the border (as several trunklines do) or a differently numbered state highway (as the rest seem to do), then it would have been listed by name.

Thanks for the review. Imzadi 1979 → 19:35, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I will now pass the article. Dough 48 72 21:09, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]