Talk:M-121 (Michigan highway)

M-121 (Michigan highway) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 6, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

U.S. Roads: State highways / Michigan Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	U.S. state highways
Locations	Michigan
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

New M-121

In addition to the source which I'm about to put in the article, this may be of interest. Mapsax (talk) 01:05, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment

The RD is plenty long; this is B-class. A note: the previous routings' history shouldn't be on this page - C L — 00:55, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just a question then as to where you'd put that history? There isn't really enough at the moment to do a dab page and split this into two articles... but I could see that being done at some point... Imzadi1979 (talk) 02:03, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Concern echoed. I believe there's enough to perform a split; the RD and history of the current route are both sufficiently long. I wouldn't be too concerned about the resulting historical articles myself; as long as what's there is fully referenced, it's fine in my opinion. – T M F 04:06, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]